Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have been thinking about this plenum/runner flow business a fair bit myself lately.

Testing the static flow of each runner on a flow-bench individually means nothing really, because you are flowing only one runner at a time, although getting them all the same is probably a good start.

What you need to do is flow all the runners together at the same time, so that for example, cylinder number one sees five cylinders worth of air passing right across in front of it.

The runner and plenum flows should be something like what happens in the car. To make it even more real, you might have to drive the inlet cam with an electric motor, so the runners pulse in turn.

I have not done it yet, but how about blowing air into the plenum under pressure, turning the inlet cam with a motor, then measuring the flow out from each combustion chamber with six identical orifice plates ?

The turbulent air into the plenum would approximate pretty much what comes out of the intercooler I would think. You could drive the inlet cam at any speed you really want as well. The only thing missing is piston action and exhaust reversion, but I think this would be as close to measuring reality as you could get.

Probably an ideal tool for plenum design testing.

I will definitely try this when my new larger flow-bench is completed, I should finally have enough airflow to do it.

A good starting point is Computational Fluid Dynamics Software. If someone can find pirated software (licence is worth tens of thousands) i can use it.

You see all the big car makers with their 3D modelling, its a very good place to start, and if you have access to the software you can setup accurate models. You still need to validate the model with calculations but you woud be surprised how easy the software is to use.

Anyone want something modelled in 3D then PM me:D

Sadly dont have access to Finite Element Analysis Softare (Forces and stresses) or Computational Fluids Software (looking at flows) but can still model stuff.

Sorry about being off topic!

...and same model different angle

Ill shut up now and let RB25 owners tell you what pistons to use.

As for compression ratios im looking at using up to 9:1 on the RB20 im building.

Im hoping to get good low rpm response, and get the turbo on song as quick as possible. (Still have to check with engine builder that im not building a hand grenade)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My bad, I unplugged the one underlined in red instead of yellow before. With the car started, after unplugging the IACV (the one underlined in yellow), it idled at around 400/500 for 3 seconds before stalling. Attempting to start the car without the IACV will not start the car.   It does stutter and sputter for around 5 seconds before dying. However, immediately after starting it, you can already hear some slight sputters from the exhaust.   It won't start with the AFM unplugged. If it is when the car has already started, it stalls in a few seconds.   Yesterday, I did take some logs using Nistune of 3 scenarios. Car idling till it stalls Car idling and unplugging the IACV Car idling and removing the AFM I also have some previous logs of when the Car is idling till it stalls and when driving and it cuts. I am not really knowledgeable enough to understand what to look for. After every test, car idles rougher and rougher, until I have to stop. It will be fine the day after.
    • There is no difference between a 17x8 and an 18x8. The total diameter of the tyre needs to remain +/- the same (so you don't mess up the gearing, speedo reading, and clearance when turning front wheels..... so you just need to use a lower profile tyre on th 18 than you do on the 17. /rocket surgery.
    • I thought the same to start with. But then I thought it was one of those LCAs where the end of the ARB goes through a bushing in the LCA itself, instead of having an end link.
    • Yeah - I mean, go the other way. Smaller range. Not larger.
    • To re-cap, I bought: https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Lsailt-8G-Infiniti-Q50-Q60-2014_1601171829627.html?spm=a2756.trade-list-buyer.0.0.2cd476e9FTIlKE As you can see, if I bought 20 it was $653, but I bought 1 so it was $1,170. I was very tempted to buy 2 and resell 1 at 25% cheaper. @MBS206, I am not sure if they do a Kluger one, here is their list but it might be there under a global model name: http://www.lsailt.com/product/android-interface?page=1 Keep in mind these full android replacements have basically all the bits a phone does (cpu, ram, storage, wifi, bluetooth, usb interfaces) other than a screen (it uses a host), thus the $800+ cost. Android Auto screen mirroring is MUCH cheaper as it's just a cut down shell, input mirroring and output mirroring BTW I also need that "screen off" feature, it is much harder to see wildlife even if a dash is reasonably dark. Both the Fuga and V37 have display off buttons for night use, they just come back on for a second or 3 if you interact with it, eg skip a song.
×
×
  • Create New...