Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently i sold a HKS gt2540 Turbo that came off my friends R33. It was in good condition without any shaft play and was driving very well before taken off the car...I was driving my friends car for abut 3 months because my friend is away and it never had any rattle noises...So about 3 weeks ago i sold the turbo for $800 on skyline forum to one of the members....he got it fitted to his car after 3 days of the sale....

The guy who bought it phoned me today and complaints that there is a rattle noise coming from the engine and its the turbo.......He recon's that the noise goes away after the car warms up n still the car runs good.. and he says turbo is no good and asking for his money back....

Before fitting the turbo he even got it checked from ATP...........

What could be the problem causing the rattle ??????????????..............

I want to help him to find what exacly the problem and direct him to the correct place instead pointing out at me...so guys please help............

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/186341-rattle-noise-after-installing-turbo/
Share on other sites

he's had it for 3 weeks an its now making a noise. sounds like he hasnt installed it right or something has come loose. has he had a mechanic check it out and diagnose it properly

he's had it for 3 weeks an its now making a noise. sounds like he hasnt installed it right or something has come loose. has he had a mechanic check it out and diagnose it properly

Thats what im guessing because when the turbo was in my car it was not making any rattles and looks like the mechanic has not installed it properly and he said he got it fitted in place in hallam..somewhere i never heard of .for 300bucks...His Car is runing stock ecu and stock injectors..

He doesn't know fitting a turbo is a complicated thing he thinks its like fitting a pod filter your self...You have to use correct bolts and proper gaskets and run the oil water lines properly throught a qulified mechanic...

$10 says the rattle is the wastegate. Tell him bend the actuator rod so the wastegate is flat up against the housing.

im pretty sure its not the turbo it can should be a small thing.......... is there any good place with a gooh mechanic in melbourne who knows what he's doing, i can send this guy to....I don't even think if i tell himto bend the actuator rod he will understand and i don't wanna go there n mukaround with it either...

Edited by chzz
Second vote for the wastegate being the source of the rattle. I've had it happen to me as well.

But still does the rattle goes away when the car warms up....He recons it happens only when he starts up the car and goes away in a while and his mechanic said turbo's blades expand when the car heats up thats why the rattlegoes away after heating up....

It was on my old car and so a few years ago now and I can't fully remember, I think it only did it when cold but not 100% sure. It would make more sense to do it when cold anyway, because all the metal will expand as it heats up including the actuator rod, thus tightening everything up a little. Turbo blades won't rattle when running if they are hitting the housing, they spin too fast. But that is what I thought was wrong with mine as well until others in this forum told me that. I took my turbo to Garrett who found a problem with the wastegate and repaired it, then no more rattle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...