Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Definately no chromies vic! lol, and very content with the bose sound at the moment, just upgrading the 6.5" subs on the parcel shelf as they have shitthemselves, and going to upgrade the HU to an audi RNS-E nav, dvd, tv, mp3 etc, very snazzy unit!

the engine is soo tidy, the turbos are down there somewhere i sware!

N1GTR - thanks mate, chip soon, had the trial program on her now i want it!!

best thing about this S4 is all the RS4 goodies bolt up to it! turbos, coolers the lot.... hello stage 3

GoldZilla - its pretty smooth, bit soft ish at low speeds but thats good on sydney roads i guess!

Joeyz

V6 2.7L Induction Twin Turbo intercooled

Power 195kW @ 5800rpm

Torque 400Nm @ 1850rpm-3600rpm

Acceleration 0-100Km/h 5.7 secs

Kerb Weight 1615kg

Fuel Consumption Urban 11.5L/100km

Fuel Consumption Extra Urban 6.6L/100km

Drive Four Wheel Drive

Transmission 6sp Manual

Wink - very sleeper, imports dont know what they have been chopped by and cops dont even bother looking!

Sanger - this car is much preferred over the skyline, but the bouncing boob scenery isnt as good!... and yeah ive got the ski port, dont know what i will do with it just yet...?

yeah but it DEFINATELY dosent feel like it, feels 1400kg max! and very throwable...

FYI

The APR 1.0 Bar performance chip for the 2.7T is good for 307 horsepower (229Kw) and 366 ft. lbs. (496Nm) of torque.

Big Upgrade!

yeah but it DEFINATELY dosent feel like it, feels 1400kg max! and very throwable...

FYI

The APR 1.0 Bar performance chip for the 2.7T is good for 307 horsepower (229Kw) and 366 ft. lbs. (496Nm) of torque.

Big Upgrade!

Yeah a mate of mine got the A4 turbo quattro when they were released (the 2004 model i think, not sure) and it felt light as, but was fkn heavy on the scales

Thats some good power for a sleeper car :D

Punctuation my friend...

It's the difference between:

1. I had to help my uncle jack off a horse.

and

2. I had to help my uncle jack, off a horse.

Point taken, must remember not to type while also doing 5 other things at once while at work, must also remember never to put my surfboard in my girlfriend again!!!!!!

Ok im getting the Haysey plates remade....

im thinking either white on blue (its a very similar blue to the car so will look ok)

or silver on black...

opinions?

Choose pink to reflect your new found metrosexuality

EDIT: Rofl 2 jokes about ed being metro in a minute.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...