Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

post-31501-1226991270_thumb.jpg

in response to $100 dolla bill thread which is better :D numbers dont lie bitches. taken from my orginal gtr special hpi mag. that decimal of a second means im like 1cm in front n stuff.

clearly my penis extension r32 is bigger and therefore better at compensating my lack of manhood than your 33s n 34s

Edited by Inline 6

i could also be agrued that they are progressively faster around a race track through the gen's as ive seen vids of the 33 and 34 smoking a 32 gtr around the race track. i believe alot of that is down to the attessa reprogramming making the newer more 4wd in the corners havin a lil more torque from the motor.

i got love for all of em but 32 will always be my fav, 34 is the best around a race track and 33 is the best value for money i think we can agree on.

and craig i dont diss peoples cars :) because after you drive a $300 dato for 7years its usually me on the recieving end of car disses. gives all a laugh though :P

if they made em smaller id want that 1 too :D 2 seater only 240z style would be crazy

Edited by Inline 6
i could also be agrued that they are progressively faster around a race track through the gen's as ive seen vids of the 33 and 34 smoking a 32 gtr around the race track. i believe alot of that is down to the attessa reprogramming making the newer more 4wd in the corners havin a lil more torque from the motor.

aerodynamics, improved suspension design, improved chassis design, etc, would all play a fairly important part also. 32 had very little in the way of aerodynamic aids, 34 however...

lol Dan, I can show you figures that have the 34 GTR doing the 1/4 in 12's and 0-100kph in 4.5sec (stock standard)

they say vspec 2 32 can break into 12s aswell, they all just the reg gtr times hpi pulled.

alternatively sled you can pull your gtr out and line me up, its on mofo :banana:

*eye of the tiger beats playing in head

tempretures n tyres n such could play a factor in it when its that close, its a bees dick diff in there times. and i think a ztune should easily pull that sled :P

also note sled im an accountant(numbers obsessed) and i used to read every single magazine that spat out 1/4 mile times for skylines and como's (jus scouting the enemy boys) thats around about what they usually put them at.

^^ i thought u thought (get smart voice) i was dissing peoples cars, never mind all good dude my care factor is very low.

Edited by Inline 6
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...