Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I missed it, but earlier in the evening, just after sunset, the 3 aligned in such a way that it looked like a smiley face!

Ive been watching them the last few nights, and this is the closest they will be/get before they keep going on their rotation. would look awesome from a telescope!

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,24736610-421,00.html

Edited by *flick*
I missed it, but earlier in the evening, just after sunset, the 3 aligned in such a way that it looked like a smiley face!

Ive been watching them the last few nights, and this is the closest they will be/get before they keep going on their rotation. would look awesome from a telescope!

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,24736610-421,00.html

now that is sooooo cool

i am going to get my mate to set the telescope up

so that we can just have some shisha and watch the stars lol

ffs, its not easy to buy a weber on ebay,

the competition is pretty stiff

here you go Carl $45 :)>>webber<<

i want SAU lan

any one know when this is going to happen ? ? ? ? ?

19th dec :D

oh Pete you need a tripod also make sure you take your camera with you i am wondering if you can go and take a picture of a section of road for me near myponga dam on reservoir rd :D for same daming evidence ;)

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0...99-2682,00.html

Too bad Advertiser! This crash wasn't the young skyline driver's fault!

Nice of them to jump to false conclusions earlier on..

Sucks for the 31 driver though..

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0...99-2682,00.html

Too bad Advertiser! This crash wasn't the young skyline driver's fault!

gold, hope that gets as much airtime as the original false story :)

some how doubt people are as interested in hearing that compared to idiot hoon drivers at it again.

poor kid though

Edited by Inline 6
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0...99-2682,00.html

Too bad Advertiser! This crash wasn't the young skyline driver's fault!

Nice of them to jump to false conclusions earlier on..

Sucks for the 31 driver though..

Yeah, I made mention of that in the Tapleys Hill Road thread and how quick the media are to blame the "hoon" to get more hits.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...