Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Your sort of right Ben

the 33 and 34 are reprogramable but the way the data is encoded to the ROM is different so it doesnt write with the same software as the 32 so no one bothers to crack it

agreed rhys 3 spoke rims are fail

Love that GT500 kit do it Cara wide body ftw

hmmm.....nahh im not into the wide body kits much.

and, lets face it, chicks dig live readouts on the pfc hand controller.

oh hell yeah.......live readouts from my pfc hand controller ftw.

on another note.....the r34 is at the panel beater's atm getting her front bar all fixed up :P

just had a fair sketchy moment, was driving round a long sweeping corner near blakeview, and someone pulled out in front of me from a side street last second as im down changing to take a right coming up in a few seconds time, miss the rev match on the downshift, rear end locks up and swings out, back right wheel collects *something*, and the dude that caused it just tore off like nothing had happened. farken...

doesnt seem like any damage was done, some yellow paint on the sidewall, but shit, got me fair rattled for a bit.

scandy, 3 spoke rims are made of fail............ IMHO

IMHO, super advans are made of win.

just getting all the stone chips and hair line fractures fixed up on it...........the bar was just feral and the graphics didnt cover all of them chips and fractures otherwise i would have left it........

unfortunatly when the bar was resprayed last year when i had my little incident with a fence pole, the paint used was way too soft and well yeah, the way the bar was before it went in this morning was a good indication never to use soft paint ever again :P

should be all good cause Simon will be finishing of the graphics before old school n new age and she will look half decent again lol then next year will be a full car respray which is needed badly atm but i dont think Simon would be too impressed if i told him that lol

not sure if anyone has noticed but my car is about 4 different shades of white :P

i dont haz pfc, oldschool gameboy with LAN cord going from gameboy to behind the dash will have to do till the funds allow :P

scandy, 3 spoke rims are made of fail............ IMHO

:P

Sorry Scandy, but 3 spoke rims are a huge fail. Reminds me of the old HSV's cruising around with a 3 spoke affair. Looks horrible.

not a fan of kits on street cars. will probably just get a jdm navan rear bar and pods, hi spec front lip, and slam it. nice and simple. nice and fat.

and 4 grand?!? bargain! ill just browse every for sale section i can find. cool thing about everyone thinking theyre shit, no one taxes 'em up. think conrad sold a set in decent offsets for less than i bought the enkeis for.

Edited by scandyflick

:P

I've noticed a huge increase of posts from people saying "I bought a 32 GTR... it's white... it has the rear spoiler lip... is it a N1? The buyer told me it was a N1... so it must be a N1..."

And

"My 32 GTR has Brembo's... but has no V-Spec sticker... is it still a V-Spec?"

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...