Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey im probably going to get a k&n air filter but just wanted to know do you hear any sucking noise compared to a pod filter??

i just got my car imported and it was serviced with a new air filter so i dont know what to do yet but its a recaro brand filter.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/
Share on other sites

hmmmm thought so :domokun:

i want low-mid torque for launch n that but i want the sucking noise too

A pod filter doesn't really mess with your low-mid torque at all.. That would have more to do with your exhaust,clutch,tyres in most circumstances..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/#findComment-3410373
Share on other sites

but doesnt k&n give u better response when accelerating and pod filter give you better top end speed or high end torque something like that

It's been said by some members on the forums here that they've noticed a little lack of low torque after putting on a POD.. But I think the gains/differences aren't that noticable.. You're car just breathers cleaner, should run a little more efficiently, get more km's per tank of fuel. I had a boxed POD with cold air intake on it on my old 33 GTS. That seemd to give me the best of both worlds.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/#findComment-3410397
Share on other sites

yeah if i go with pod im gone need heat shield and good setup so it breaths cold air properly...and im not to good at all this stuff

There's a member on the forums here called Maxx he makes and sells the boxes for R33's anyway it just replaced your stock airobox, encloses the pod, has a clear plastic top so you can see in and still keeps the stock snorkel feed.. See below. If you wanted to get more out of it I'd set up some PVC piping or something from the front bar to blow underneath the pod aswell.. More air can't hurt.

2r24xgj.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/#findComment-3410446
Share on other sites

i have a yellow paper panel filter on my r34 im not sure what brand it is but it was on it when i got it. anyway above 4000rpm i can hear a sucking noise it sounds pretty cool. and in my old car i had a k and n air filter and it used to make more of a whistling noise, but both weren't really loud but you could hear them without the radio on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/#findComment-3410572
Share on other sites

I started with the stock airbox, went to a pod in a cold airbox with cold air feed, and then back to the standard air box with an Apexi panel filter.

When I changed back to the standard air box, I could notice the following:

- less top end pull

- much better lower end torque for day to day driving

- quieter

If you decide to get a pod, definitely get a heat shield and pipe some cold air to it. I'd recommend a dry/paper filter, not an oiled one like K&N. In a test the Apexi filter had the best filtration and flows just as well or better than the others. It is dry so you can just blow it out with an air compressor when it needs cleaning - ie no messy oil kits.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/#findComment-3419844
Share on other sites

I used to have a Apexi power intake pod but recently noticed it was dirty so i put the stock air box back on again. The car runs the same, if not better (smoother?).

I could only hear the suction noise if the bonnet was open otherwise i really didn't notice much of a suction noise that everyone goes on about. IMO save your $89, spend it on something else :D

btw you might find this useful, it gives a comparison on the different brands: http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/2/

Edited by shaun123
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/#findComment-3420960
Share on other sites

I used to have a Apexi power intake pod but recently noticed it was dirty so i put the stock air box back on again. The car runs the same, if not better (smoother?).

I could only hear the suction noise if the bonnet was open otherwise i really didn't notice much of a suction noise that everyone goes on about. IMO save your $89, spend it on something else :)

btw you might find this useful, it gives a comparison on the different brands: http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/2/

You should have cleaned your pod!! It makes a massive difference.

I agree that the Apexi pod does not make much sucking noise, but it is louder than the standard box.

hmmm i have my mind made up one minute then change hahhaha

$89 Apexi Pod

or around $100+ for K&N panel filter

i still duno yet :)

im sort of leaning towards k&n Panel filter

I'd go with the panel filter :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/#findComment-3421670
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I find the K&N panel filters to give better responsiveness. As a daily driver I just find something like this to suit my needs. But if your really out for the the intake sound, go for the pod, but as everyone said, let it at least have some cold air feed.

Just wondering what pod filter to get on my 34 gt

I want a sucking noise

which pod delivers on that... personally i was gonna go blitz but not sure

what you guys think???????

tahhh

Most likely the Blitz and K&N Pod's. I haven't used apex'i but as far as I can see it won't be as noisy as the two brands. Though I've heard that some cheap brand Pods use cheap oil which can make the sensor dirty reducing performance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/#findComment-3440003
Share on other sites

just changed from k&n panel to apexi pod. found the pod to be heaps better and fixed the problem of oil slowly getting onto my air flow meter and stuffing up my a/f ratios. if your gunna use a panel use a dry one, not oiled. :O

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/#findComment-3440038
Share on other sites

I find the K&N panel filters to give better responsiveness. As a daily driver I just find something like this to suit my needs. But if your really out for the the intake sound, go for the pod, but as everyone said, let it at least have some cold air feed.

Most likely the Blitz and K&N Pod's. I haven't used apex'i but as far as I can see it won't be as noisy as the two brands. Though I've heard that some cheap brand Pods use cheap oil which can make the sensor dirty reducing performance.

i was thinking that aswell... thatnks for the help mate

cheers bud

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189214-kn-filter/#findComment-3440050
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...