Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im just trying to say there is more than one option

gtr

gtr is hte LAST option id do mainly becuase of hte cost

you can get an r200 and shim it and get great traction(or loss of it, whatever your desire)

im just trying to say there is more than one option

gtr

gtr is hte LAST option id do mainly becuase of hte cost

you can get an r200 and shim it and get great traction(or loss of it, whatever your desire)

I understand. If anyone else were to do it (and not start with a GTR diff like I did) then yes there are definitely more options. It is difficult finding a 4.11 ratio to match the GTR front diff though.

errr

let me rephrase then

for people that took the front driveshaft out, and need a diff...lol

:laughing-smiley-014: Sweet as.

Saturday went 90% as planned but I'm still short a LH axle. Just trying to figure it out at the moment. Unfortunately thats what happens sometimes when you make assumptions :yes:

Just so everyone knows; 260RS axle are not the same as GTR in either thickness (including splines) or length. They are the same diameter & spline count as R34 GT-T though.

MY RH axle is done using a combination of a RH GT-T axle & 260RS diff end & I am getting a GT-T CV modified to fit onto a R32 GTS-4 LHR axle as I write this. Hopefully should be done in a week or two as the guy is pretty busy.

All sorted.

* RS-Four hub carriers with 260RS (or GTR or R32 GTS4) hubs fitted hence enabling me to use my RS-Four adjustable coilovers

* R32 GTS4 LH Axle in the LHR (unmodified)

* R34 GT-T RHR Axle with 260RS ends

Anyone would be able to recreate what I've done easily enough apart from needing a 260RS axle of course

I could be mistaken, but I believe a Z32 axle was used when mine was changed over to Gtr rear. That's what I was led to believe, anyway.

That said, My rear track seems to be significantly wider than anyone else's ZI've seen (R34 GTR wheels sit juuuust outside the rear guards), so that may have something to do with it...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...