Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey ppls,

Thought I'd throw this out to some of you that have had a bit of experience playing with cams.

Deciding on cams for the car; hope to have them in within a couple of weeks.

1. 254duration 8.5mm lift of which I've seen pick up 26rwkw on 1psi less boost up with power up around 250rwkw and it lost no bottom end, holds power after peak much better and interestingly an improvement in fuel economy.

2. 265duration 8.9mm lift cams.

Its an RB30DET, GT30r .82. The heads had a little work done to it, usual port polish/multi angle valve jobs, valve deshroud and is currently making close to 270rwkw on 1bar. Std inlet manifold, std exhaust manifold of which I wish to retain.

The car is daily driven as I wish to enjoy it daily. Currently returns 450km's to a tank of juice and scrapes 400km's if I give it a bit of stick.

The bloke tuning the car has said 265duration FTW as its a 3ltr and it will soak it up fine. I've seen the 254's return good gains so Im in two minds if I should or not as I wish to retain the std exh manifold and later down the track drop a WMI kit on it to see what I can squeeze out of it for a stock looking motor.

So who's had a play with similiar cam specs?

What were the gains/losses fuel economy idle quality etc? I wouldn't mind a bit of that horn RB lope. :P

Any of you have rough comparison dyno runs before/after the cams?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190809-254-or-265-cams-s/
Share on other sites

increased capacity and static comp tend to tame cams, but if youve decreased the comp and increased the capacity you may well be back where you started. what comp you using? what boost do you run? Honestley a split setup works very well 256/264 for most mild setups and most of the new profiles of late seem to be this split type.

Cheers.

Static comp is up near 9:1; currently running 1bar and making 268rwkw. As I said above its had a little head work so compared to others on the same dyno with the same/similiar turbo it seems to be making 10-20rwkw more. Possibly the slightly higher comp is the helper.

Hrmm so 256/264. Might definitely have to consider that as the rb25 heads to tend to suffer a little on the exhaust side of things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...