Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

VR38DETT a series VQ + HRVQ with some modification A Result series VR38DETT simply failed engine failure murderer you will see it soon!!

Why are you surprised a lot for the engine failed, in fact??

How has the VQ failed?

The Nismo 380RS has a motorsport version of the engine that makes 400ps with no turbo. That's not bad in anyone's books.

Z1 Auto in the States has just pulled 300rwhp out of a VQ35DE with relatively few modifications, which puts it awfully close to the 100hp/L NA target most "NA sports car OEMs" aim for.

On the FI side, the standard VQ35DE in the V35/Z33 can make a reliable 300rwkW with a pair of turbos at 7psi. There are plenty of guys doing engine rebuilds making 400rwkW at under 1bar, and a high powered drag racer making 1300kW with a VQ.

Nismo has raced, and won, the SuperGT championship with a VQ30DETT in its GT500 Skyline and FairladyZ's in the last few years.

How has the VQ failed?

The Nismo 380RS has a motorsport version of the engine that makes 400ps with no turbo. That's not bad in anyone's books.

Z1 Auto in the States has just pulled 300rwhp out of a VQ35DE with relatively few modifications, which puts it awfully close to the 100hp/L NA target most "NA sports car OEMs" aim for.

On the FI side, the standard VQ35DE in the V35/Z33 can make a reliable 300rwkW with a pair of turbos at 7psi. There are plenty of guys doing engine rebuilds making 400rwkW at under 1bar, and a high powered drag racer making 1300kW with a VQ.

Nismo has raced, and won, the SuperGT championship with a VQ30DETT in its GT500 Skyline and FairladyZ's in the last few years.

All that said I know!! Little did come again!!

Are completion little?? Is VQ 350Z engine successful??!!

Yes engine VQ 350Z good use of the normal daily and only!! But the engine failed absolute failure of a car such as NISSAN Z sports cars, unfortunately!!

The amendment was NEW GTR and the result will be the same shock 350Z with the difference of additional specifications + TWIN TURBO!!! Since it bears the name of legend GTR I regret this and the coming days will prove what I mean!!!

THANKS ALL .....!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bkc...

1.The 350Z is one of the most popular tuned cars in America. The tuning scene in America has taken the Z in open arms.

2. It is not only good for normal daily driving, Nismo have used the engine in their JGTC cars

3. In JGTC the RB26 is getting phased out. As far as I know the grand touring R34 GT-R now uses a twin turbo 350z motor.

4. On a stock motor it is just as reliable if not more than and RB26, but doesn't suffer from oiling problems.

5. THE VR38DETT IS NOT THE SAME AS A VQ MOTOR...THE BLOCK DESIGN IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. NOT JUST INTERNALS ARE DIFFERENT. THEY ARE DIFFERENT.

6. The latest GT-R is a big success, 2200 orders have been placed and demand has outstripped supply! It has run a 7minutes 38seconds at nurburgring. The engine has been thoroughly tested. I'm sure if you removed the emissions restrictions the motor would see 400kw easily.

All that said I know!! Little did come again!!

Are completion little?? Is VQ 350Z engine successful??!!

Yes engine VQ 350Z good use of the normal daily and only!! But the engine failed absolute failure of a car such as NISSAN Z sports cars, unfortunately!!

The amendment was NEW GTR and the result will be the same shock 350Z with the difference of additional specifications + TWIN TURBO!!! Since it bears the name of legend GTR I regret this and the coming days will prove what I mean!!!

THANKS ALL .....!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Obviously you couldn't handle my post, too much English for the translator?

I gave several reasons WHY the V6 is superior, so now it's your turn. In Australia we call it PUT UP OR SHUT UP .

Cheers

Gary

Yes, that is the MINES GTR... it's NOT a FACTORY Nissan...

once again, you can't compare the new Nissan GTR to a Modified R34. Wait until MINES get their hands on the R35.. THEN do the comparison.

(is he taking us for a ride?)

Yes, that is the MINES GTR... it's NOT a FACTORY Nissan...

once again, you can't compare the new Nissan GTR to a Modified R34. Wait until MINES get their hands on the R35.. THEN do the comparison.

(is he taking us for a ride?)

Even after the Modified will not be the result of NEW GTR same results, which arrived with the engine RB26DETT!!!

Thanks ALL ....... :)

Can we turn this thread into facts (and reasonable assumption) or ban? :ph34r:

There's only a tiny amount of real discussion in here.

I know you very estimator and in a state of shock and will consider it soon!!!

Thanks aLL ...... :)

Even after the Modified will not be the result of NEW GTR same results, which arrived with the engine RB26DETT!!!

Thanks ALL ....... :)

no it won't be the result of RB26DETT...

do you really think that Jap tuning houses would take the new GTR, throw all their knowledge and experience at it and come out with worse results than the old RB26?

you been smoking to much of that Shisha, haven't you?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
    • Ceste, jak se mas Marek...sorry I only have english keyboard. Are you a fan of Poland's greatest band ever?   
×
×
  • Create New...