Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey forum hows it going? Here to ask the opinions of the experts again. What I want to know is if a dead clutch can affect ignition timing? My car is a 95 gts-t mods are 3.5" turbo back exhaust with split dump, fmic, pod with cai, bosch 040 fuel pump, iridium plugs gapped at .7, boost turned up to 12 psi and afc neo . Ok I was just trying to up my knowledge level, so I got a timing light and was looking to see where my ignition timing was. After the car was completely warmed and i took a look I noticed it was at the first white mark which means 5 degrees btdc now I'm no expert but according to the forum and threads I have read shouldn't that be at 15 also I turned the cas all the way anticlockwise to see what would happen and the mark moved from 5 to about 15 degrees btdc. Now the low side of my neo has been adjusted to take out some fuel. I just wanted to know does this weird reading signify a problem, is it cus of my afc neo adjustments or can it be my clutch as it is dead? If so what are my options? Also I already turned the cas back to its original position and its now back to 5 degrees btdc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194118-ignition-timing-question/
Share on other sites

Don't know how you could come to the conclusion that a clutch (in any condition) could possibly affect ignition timing.

If you have a programmable ECU, then you have to calibrate it (tell it where TDC is) before setting base ignition timing. You also need to be aware that some timing lights can give incorrect indications.

did you disconnect the aac valve before taking the reading, at what rpm did you take the reading? and where did you take your signal from?

base timing cant be changed by a safc neo. you cant indirectly affect the ignition timing added on by the ecu by taking or adding fuel with the neo but this will not change your base timing.

did you disconnect the aac valve before taking the reading, at what rpm did you take the reading? and where did you take your signal from?

base timing cant be changed by a safc neo. you cant indirectly affect the ignition timing added on by the ecu by taking or adding fuel with the neo but this will not change your base timing.

Ok here is the deal when I took the reading the aac valve and tps was connected I took the signal from the first spark plug thats when I got the reading of 5 degrees or saw it at the first white mark and the rpm was around 780 -800. I then tried to advance it and the furthest it could get to was 15 degrees btdc or the third white mark so I put it back to where it was. I then disconnected the tps and the rpms went up to like 1180 and when I checked timing It was at the 4th white mark or 20 degrees btdc. I reconneted the tps rpms went down to 780-800 and it read 5 btdc i disconnected the tps rpms went up to 1180 and the timing read 20 btdc and i did this about 4 times with same result. With the tps off I decided to retard the timing a bit via cas so I put it to 15 btdc with tps disconnected and the rpms went to about 900 and when I reconnected the tps rpms dropped to about 700 and timing could not be read it was in front of the orange mark so i put it back to the original position. Like I said some fuel had been taken out via afc neo and I wanted to know if that what was affecting the ignition timing and if it indicated a prob or if this was a normal thing to happen. For it to read 5 btdc at idle.

have you tried taking a reading from the loop in the coilpack loom at the back of the engine.

how does the car drive, how does it feel? have you had the cas off anytime lately, and put it back on like a tooth off???

have you tried taking a reading from the loop in the coilpack loom at the back of the engine.

how does the car drive, how does it feel? have you had the cas off anytime lately, and put it back on like a tooth off???

Nah the cas was never off and no I only took the signal off the number one spark plug. A fair bit of fuel has been taken out of the low throttle side via afc neo, 21 to be exact. Could this have anything to do with the timing being so low at idle? Cant tell how it drives as I haven't driven it lately due to clutch being dead was just checking the timing of the car for experience and to make sure all was right for when the new clutch goes in this weekend. What does the rpm jumping to 1180 and the timing reading 20 btdc when i disconnect the tps mean?

What does the rpm jumping to 1180 and the timing reading 20 btdc when i disconnect the tps mean?

just means your base idle is abit off, the aac valve fixes it up when its plugged in. when you engine revs higher your base timing readings get larger, they are also wrong. the base timing needs to be set at a certain rpm for the reading to be correct.

at what rpm are you taking that much fuel out at? it doesnt really matter at idle because the ecu runs on closed loop and does its own correction.

just means your base idle is abit off, the aac valve fixes it up when its plugged in. when you engine revs higher your base timing readings get larger, they are also wrong. the base timing needs to be set at a certain rpm for the reading to be correct.

at what rpm are you taking that much fuel out at? it doesnt really matter at idle because the ecu runs on closed loop and does its own correction.

ok the rpm tht the fuel comes out at is idle which is 800 with acc and tps connected. Just to know I never disconnected the acc only the tps, as stated by the manual. So you think that because so much fuel has been taken out that is why timing is so low cus at that -21% correction I advanced the timing via cas as far as it would go and the reading only came up to 15. Also whenever I disconnect the tps idle goes up and when I reconnect it idle goes down I tried to fix the idle but my ecu does not have the adjustment knob on it, neither the red light, or any kind of light for that fact, that shows error signals. So I just adjusted using the idle screw and got it to as close to 900 as I could and with the tps off that worked out to be 1180 rpms.

i cant see why you would need -21% correction at idle have you tried taking the low throttle correction untill about 2000rpm back to 0% and see what happens. and have you tried a different timing light?

also in the sensor check screen on the neo what does it say your tps voltage is?

Edited by QWK32
i cant see why you would need -21% correction at idle have you tried taking the low throttle correction untill about 2000rpm back to 0% and see what happens. and have you tried a different timing light?

also in the sensor check screen on the neo what does it say your tps voltage is?

I just did it awhile back as when at idle with the neo being to 0 my wideband read afr's of 12 after warming up for 10 mins so I took out fuel until it read 14.7, no I didnt take a reading with the neo at 0 will do tomorrow and no I have not tried a different timing light have to find someone with one first. I will try taking a reading with the neo at 0 tomorrow when I get a chance. If it does advance it back to 15 btdc do I leave it there, does it being at 5 btdc endanger the engine in anyway on the low side of the neo, does having the low side of the neo that much retard affect the hi throttle side of the tune? If I were to advance my timing to 20 and still tune my neo for 12 afr's do i risk damaging my engine? Just to know I always run 100 octane fuel. Will also check tps voltage.

Edited by Daboss
  • 2 years later...
  • 1 month later...
Do a diagnostic check, the ecu is retarding the ignition timing to try and drag the idle speed down

But why?? That makes sense but what could cause the ecu to retard timing?? I did a diagnostic check the manual way and only got code 55. I have a nismo thermostat that opens at 150 degrees. would that cause any issues?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
    • The odometer does go up when driving.  Does this tell it is an issue with the speedometer itself?    Where can I look for replacement cluster? Or speedo? I can likely do the repair.. Will ER34 cluster work on HR34? Or do I need a HR34 20GT S2 specifically lol   
    • Mine's a bit bigger at 70x150mm roughly. The spots are flat, just can feel the edges if I dig my nail into it. I did fix some other other ones by both using my finger to sand that small spot (I'm a bit wary of doing this and creating hot spots and a bigger mess) and I also did sand over it flat and others, but this also worried me a bit because if I create an overall low spot on the panel on paint that is good.  Correct me if I'm wrong but as long as it's flat even if I can feel the edges, I can put filler because it will all be level once I sand it? I can see myself going in a circle after sanding guidecoat with 320 grit if for example the panel is flat with my hand but because I sanded the guidecoat I could have created a low spot again somewhere. Unless where I'm going wrong is what I mentioned previously where I didn't go low enough on the grits. It's 1 step forward and 2 step backwards here haha. I'll probably need to experiment with it more. Last time I go back to bare metal lol.
×
×
  • Create New...