Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey forum hows it going? Here to ask the opinions of the experts again. What I want to know is if a dead clutch can affect ignition timing? My car is a 95 gts-t mods are 3.5" turbo back exhaust with split dump, fmic, pod with cai, bosch 040 fuel pump, iridium plugs gapped at .7, boost turned up to 12 psi and afc neo . Ok I was just trying to up my knowledge level, so I got a timing light and was looking to see where my ignition timing was. After the car was completely warmed and i took a look I noticed it was at the first white mark which means 5 degrees btdc now I'm no expert but according to the forum and threads I have read shouldn't that be at 15 also I turned the cas all the way anticlockwise to see what would happen and the mark moved from 5 to about 15 degrees btdc. Now the low side of my neo has been adjusted to take out some fuel. I just wanted to know does this weird reading signify a problem, is it cus of my afc neo adjustments or can it be my clutch as it is dead? If so what are my options? Also I already turned the cas back to its original position and its now back to 5 degrees btdc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194118-ignition-timing-question/
Share on other sites

Don't know how you could come to the conclusion that a clutch (in any condition) could possibly affect ignition timing.

If you have a programmable ECU, then you have to calibrate it (tell it where TDC is) before setting base ignition timing. You also need to be aware that some timing lights can give incorrect indications.

did you disconnect the aac valve before taking the reading, at what rpm did you take the reading? and where did you take your signal from?

base timing cant be changed by a safc neo. you cant indirectly affect the ignition timing added on by the ecu by taking or adding fuel with the neo but this will not change your base timing.

did you disconnect the aac valve before taking the reading, at what rpm did you take the reading? and where did you take your signal from?

base timing cant be changed by a safc neo. you cant indirectly affect the ignition timing added on by the ecu by taking or adding fuel with the neo but this will not change your base timing.

Ok here is the deal when I took the reading the aac valve and tps was connected I took the signal from the first spark plug thats when I got the reading of 5 degrees or saw it at the first white mark and the rpm was around 780 -800. I then tried to advance it and the furthest it could get to was 15 degrees btdc or the third white mark so I put it back to where it was. I then disconnected the tps and the rpms went up to like 1180 and when I checked timing It was at the 4th white mark or 20 degrees btdc. I reconneted the tps rpms went down to 780-800 and it read 5 btdc i disconnected the tps rpms went up to 1180 and the timing read 20 btdc and i did this about 4 times with same result. With the tps off I decided to retard the timing a bit via cas so I put it to 15 btdc with tps disconnected and the rpms went to about 900 and when I reconnected the tps rpms dropped to about 700 and timing could not be read it was in front of the orange mark so i put it back to the original position. Like I said some fuel had been taken out via afc neo and I wanted to know if that what was affecting the ignition timing and if it indicated a prob or if this was a normal thing to happen. For it to read 5 btdc at idle.

have you tried taking a reading from the loop in the coilpack loom at the back of the engine.

how does the car drive, how does it feel? have you had the cas off anytime lately, and put it back on like a tooth off???

have you tried taking a reading from the loop in the coilpack loom at the back of the engine.

how does the car drive, how does it feel? have you had the cas off anytime lately, and put it back on like a tooth off???

Nah the cas was never off and no I only took the signal off the number one spark plug. A fair bit of fuel has been taken out of the low throttle side via afc neo, 21 to be exact. Could this have anything to do with the timing being so low at idle? Cant tell how it drives as I haven't driven it lately due to clutch being dead was just checking the timing of the car for experience and to make sure all was right for when the new clutch goes in this weekend. What does the rpm jumping to 1180 and the timing reading 20 btdc when i disconnect the tps mean?

What does the rpm jumping to 1180 and the timing reading 20 btdc when i disconnect the tps mean?

just means your base idle is abit off, the aac valve fixes it up when its plugged in. when you engine revs higher your base timing readings get larger, they are also wrong. the base timing needs to be set at a certain rpm for the reading to be correct.

at what rpm are you taking that much fuel out at? it doesnt really matter at idle because the ecu runs on closed loop and does its own correction.

just means your base idle is abit off, the aac valve fixes it up when its plugged in. when you engine revs higher your base timing readings get larger, they are also wrong. the base timing needs to be set at a certain rpm for the reading to be correct.

at what rpm are you taking that much fuel out at? it doesnt really matter at idle because the ecu runs on closed loop and does its own correction.

ok the rpm tht the fuel comes out at is idle which is 800 with acc and tps connected. Just to know I never disconnected the acc only the tps, as stated by the manual. So you think that because so much fuel has been taken out that is why timing is so low cus at that -21% correction I advanced the timing via cas as far as it would go and the reading only came up to 15. Also whenever I disconnect the tps idle goes up and when I reconnect it idle goes down I tried to fix the idle but my ecu does not have the adjustment knob on it, neither the red light, or any kind of light for that fact, that shows error signals. So I just adjusted using the idle screw and got it to as close to 900 as I could and with the tps off that worked out to be 1180 rpms.

i cant see why you would need -21% correction at idle have you tried taking the low throttle correction untill about 2000rpm back to 0% and see what happens. and have you tried a different timing light?

also in the sensor check screen on the neo what does it say your tps voltage is?

Edited by QWK32
i cant see why you would need -21% correction at idle have you tried taking the low throttle correction untill about 2000rpm back to 0% and see what happens. and have you tried a different timing light?

also in the sensor check screen on the neo what does it say your tps voltage is?

I just did it awhile back as when at idle with the neo being to 0 my wideband read afr's of 12 after warming up for 10 mins so I took out fuel until it read 14.7, no I didnt take a reading with the neo at 0 will do tomorrow and no I have not tried a different timing light have to find someone with one first. I will try taking a reading with the neo at 0 tomorrow when I get a chance. If it does advance it back to 15 btdc do I leave it there, does it being at 5 btdc endanger the engine in anyway on the low side of the neo, does having the low side of the neo that much retard affect the hi throttle side of the tune? If I were to advance my timing to 20 and still tune my neo for 12 afr's do i risk damaging my engine? Just to know I always run 100 octane fuel. Will also check tps voltage.

Edited by Daboss
  • 2 years later...
  • 1 month later...
Do a diagnostic check, the ecu is retarding the ignition timing to try and drag the idle speed down

But why?? That makes sense but what could cause the ecu to retard timing?? I did a diagnostic check the manual way and only got code 55. I have a nismo thermostat that opens at 150 degrees. would that cause any issues?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...