Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a 98 GTT and want to fit some vented front fenders but I'm not sure if I should get the GTT or GTR vented front fenders.

Anyone know the difference between the GTT aftermarket vented front fenders and the GTR aftermarket vented front fenders? Are the GTT vented front fenders smaller in terms of clearance? Would it be better to get the GTR vented front fenders so I can fit wider rims if the clearance is bigger?

The style of fenders for the GTT I'm talking about are these.. The GTR vented fenders are similar I'm guessing... I never seen them clearly. I'm not talking about the 'horned' looking vented fenders for the GTR.. just the plain vented ones. Thanks for any help on this!

2659902_51.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196653-r34-gtt-front-vented-fenders/
Share on other sites

I found these on the Japan Yahoo Auction.. they cost around $235 USD after conversion. I know someone who you can get a quote from and will send them to you. Go to www.RHDJapan.com The owner is Russell Hobbs and Patrick Antell. E-mail them with the picture of the fender and they will get you a quote. They can actually get you anything. I bought my BCNR33 RB26DETT from them. If you don't know the product name you can send them a picture of what you want and they can find it and price it. I live in S.Korea so the prices are good for me.. I don't know how they'll be for you guys.

..but back to my question. What is the difference in clearance with the two fenders? Anyone fitted the GTR vented fenders on a GTT before?

no i mean if he changes his fenders to gtr ones

ah tru, misunderstood that, if there isnt a great deal of difference then might as well go for the gtt ones,

I wouldnt mind a set, at 235$US (per set?) i think its worth while, of course it would also require the re-spray

I just check my e-mail for the exact price... 31,290 JPY http://www.xxx-treme.jp/parts/fender_er34.htm I guess they do R33 and R32 vented fenders too.

R33cruiser, thats what i'm talking about. How many mm difference would it be if i were to get the do luck gtr vented fenders

DOL20131610001.jpg

vs the GTT stock fenders.

And does anyone know if these GTT vented fenders are wider or just a stock replacement.

fender_er34_l.jpg

Hey thanks 4 ur help! Much appreciated :D

and if u change ur front fenders, dont u then need to change ur front bar?

yup, I plan on changing my front bar to East Bear, bonnet to East Bear Aero and fenders to either do-luck gtr aero or gtt vented. I just need to know what the mm difference is so I can buy my rims and have them sit nicely.

I just check my e-mail for the exact price... 31,290 JPY http://www.xxx-treme.jp/parts/fender_er34.htm I guess they do R33 and R32 vented fenders too.

R33cruiser, thats what i'm talking about. How many mm difference would it be if i were to get the do luck gtr vented fenders

DOL20131610001.jpg

vs the GTT stock fenders.

And does anyone know if these GTT vented fenders are wider or just a stock replacement.

fender_er34_l.jpg

Going by what i used to have on my R33, the vented GTT guards are about 20mm wider, but taper back to meet with the factory front bumper mount locations.

If you go the GTR guards, you will require a bonnet, hinges, front bumper and a few other alterations to get it all to fit. But overall wheel clearance is much more than the GTT vented guards, as the GTR's front bumpers sit out about 50mm wider than a GTT and the guards don't taper in.

we got R34 GTR guards to suit R34 GTT if you cant find any see http://www.uras.com.au/syohin/skyline.html#r34 from memory they are $649 and genuine URAS bolt on replacements

R34_1.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...