Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,

Here's the story...

I bought a full set of rda slotted and ebc red stuff back in august. i had them professionally installed and bed-in by my local mechanic and immediately they were exhibiting some unusual brake squeal.

it was unusual in that, the harder i pressed the brakes, the louder the noise became. regardless of how warm or hot the brakes got the screech was ever present. in fact when the pads got hotter the noise seemed to get louder! the only silence I had was on the first few brakes in the morning after the car had been sleeping over night.

After searching on the forums I tried using some of that red brake goo, but that did exactly diddly squat. the noise was still there with no change.

I took the car to a few performance workshops, and they all said it was because of my combination of rda rotors and ebc redstuff. both being hard, the pads weren't able to "bite" into the rotor and so they slipped (vibrated) across and made the noise. all the workshops recommended that if I put some ebc greenstuff instead it'd be all sweet and dandy.

So...

just recently i got some green stuff (again with professional installation and bed in). much to my dismay the noise is still there, albeit with different behaviour.

this time if i run the car through a series of hard braking (60 to 10 kmh about 7 times), the pads go completely silent... until they cool (even after a few minutes) where the noise slowly increases as the pads cool further.

also, at normal street driving temperatures, the pads seem to squeak (slightly) less if i press hard. but they're still pretty damn loud either way, sometimes almost deafening.

I've run out of ideas, and moreover this squeaking is making me DREAD the thought of driving my car ;). something no skyline owner should have to experience!

can anybody PLEASE offer any suggestions? if you live in melbourne and think you might have a solution I'd be more than happy to meet you somewhere and pop ur ear drums for u (yes it really is that bad sometimes) if you can help me fix my problem you WILL be rewarded!. I'm getting pretty desperate and i fear my sanity is fast deteriorating :wave:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/197552-brake-screech/
Share on other sites

the squealing is a resonance in the disc making it act like a bell. try descaling the hubs, backs of the wheels, and the disc mounting surfaces. its been known to eliminate brake noise. also try using some el cheapo pads like Ferodo XL. the red stuff squealing doesn't surprise me, way too hard for the road. for that matter unless you're always running the greenstuff at optimum temp it won't be coating the disc with compound and will also be more prone to squeal.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/197552-brake-screech/#findComment-3533026
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...