Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item: 4 18x8 Deep Dish Shadow Chrome Wheels with rubber 90% tred left

Tyre Profile: Nankang Ultra Sport NS-2 235/40

Condition:**IMMAC**

Offset: +35 all round

Price:1000 pickup

Location: Melbourne East Side

Contact: PM or email me at "[email protected]"

hope the mods dont mind the old thread was filled with useless supra talk.

buyer fell through so they are back up.

836e_1.JPG

dsc00017qw6.jpg

dsc00013wz9.jpg

dsc00090ku1.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/198275-cheap-deep-dish-rims-inc-tyres/
Share on other sites

You got a side on pic of them on the car mate?

can arrange give us a few days. im lazy lol

how wide are these rims? (what size tyres can they fit...)

mate read the 1st post. they 8" and the tyres are up above

Question + Interest. Just wanted to know bud is 235/40 on 8" a bit small, also you have brand new pic of rim plus on car pic's, is there any scuff marks or scraches? And when polished up do they still come up great? Also what brand of rim are they?

mate u should see these things polished up, they look immac. ive bought this metal polish from autobarn (about 20bux) and i used a buffer and they shine like chrome wheels.

the wheels are pretty much immac, but with any type of wheels u drive on the road they get the usual small scratch from rocks on the road. but they are honestly impossible to see. but they are there. like i said i consider them IMMACULATE

pretty sure they are apec apache.

correct

Edited by R34NRG

holy shit

$1000 with tyres????

thats dirt cheap. man if i had a spare $1000 id buy these and jus hang them on the wall for a while.

good stuff and good luck. Thats a very nice set for that price

im sure someone will c it soon and grab em off ya

  • 2 weeks later...

hey mate, how much for shiping them to perth ?

by the way check out http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...rn-t200271.html and let me know what you think i know uv gone down very simillor path :(

SORRY BUDDY THEY ARE

SOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!

but yeh been lookn at that thread for a while, plannin to put some input soon

Edited by R34NRG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...