Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For Steve and those wondering:

I was told that 2 of my cylinders lost compression.

So got a compression tester today and checked for myself....

I don't know which cylinder is which, but for the sake of it , My Cylinder 1 is the one closest to the Crank Angle Sensor and cylinder 6 is the one closest to the firewall.

Cylinder 1 - 127 PSI

Cylinder 2 - 55 PSI

Cylinder 3 - 150 PSI

Cylinder 4 - 40 PSI

Cylinder 5 - 50 PSI

Clyinder 6 - 50 PSI

Hmmmmmmm - I don't know how the car even started.

Since 1 & 3 are OK-ish - that sort of rules out the plenum doesn't it ???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19860-my-comression-test/
Share on other sites

Jeez, you did a good job there Brendan.

As what megs says, dont think you can rule anything out as yet - plenum, injectors, or ECU. But I would definately get the injectors tested esp as they have been highflowed, find out what the difference of flow rate is and what pattern they are spraying. As the head has to come off, removing the injectors would be pretty simple/cheap and the testing isnt too expensive - I had my new ones flowed for $5.50 each.

Then get the plenum tested too, to be on the safe side. Must be someone in Sydney with a flow bench who could give you a figure.

With ECUs quite often it has something to do with who is punching the figures. Which one are you using again?

At the end of the day, the engine could have had a hard life in the hands of the previous owner - but I would like to make sure before I go puting stuff back on, just to be on the safe side.

Still laughing at the compression test results - sorry but its pretty funny:D

I'm gonna do the test again on the weekend - Thinking more about it - it can't be right. Cause the engine starts (doesn't idle tho) - and I drove it for a short distance after failure. Surely, with a result like this , the engine wouldn't run.

When I was doing the compression test - the battery was dying, I dunno if that would make a difference ?? I've charged it up now, so I'll do the test again to be sure to be sure.

Steve - you are right - it's pretty funny. But you know what ...- I spent the money on these mods, missed 3 track days waiting for the bloody thing to finish, it still wasn't right so I took it back - Told them I had to have it back for a Skidpan day - So the day before the skidpan day, they tuned & dyno'd - Then driving to the skidpan day - this happens - 2nd gear - 3/4 throttle - under the speed limit, accelerating fast but not flat out - then poof. And I did not touch the boost or anything to do with the setup.

So, yes, while I can laugh about it now - I wasn't laughing when it happened and for about 4-5 weeks after that.

Now I realise that when modifying cars this can happen and you must choose and research the parts , etc, etc, you go with very carefully.

It's also why I am going a bit over kill on the new rebuild Specs - Megs mentioned GTR pistons, which are good - but forgies are better so that's why I'm doing that -

PS - I was running EMS - but not any more - I'm chucking that shit out - And am going to go Autronic or Microtech. (I did consider MOTEC bu that was a little too over the top I feel)

I'll be getting the injectors re-flow & pattern tested for sure. No doubt about that - Also the fuel lines , pump, rail and regulator - they were all meant to be new & good.

Once burned - Twice Shy !

Hi B-man it sucks I think if your injectors were hiflowed you might find the issue there. any way

the motor can and will run mine ran fro 8 weeks with 0 in one cylinder and 4 in another the rb's ar a well built motor.

I ahve heard a number of disturbing stories about the hiflowed injectors and wouldnt use them. thereis a reason why the after market injectors are expensive.

honestly If your pulling the ems I would only use a power fc seriously and I would consider going to a stock plenium or a greddy unit.

the gtr pistons are great but I understand why you want to go forged.

do your build run the stock injectors tune it for 200-220 rwkw for now then come back and go for the stronger tuned once the car is run in etc.

its not until you have a major failure that you start to see the benifits of a plan hence the part on my site re mods its important.

dont loose heart you will get there but there is nothing worse than having your baby in the shop . atm I have 2 babies in the shop the cefiro just about finished with compliance and my next project the r32 with the sr 20.

its and interesting fun game modifying cars the problem is once you start you get to be an old boy liek me and you just keep on going

meggala

Cheers for that Dino - that would be very interesting news - and local too - Bonus. Very keen to keep hear about that !

Steve, I think you might be right about the Power FC - It's proven and it has the runs on the board and to me, that is important - I've been thinking about the ECU quite a bit - and talking to different shops about it - I reckon they only want to sell you what makes them the most margin - Not what the best solution is. The PFC is un-surpassed. Means a bit more re-modification for me tho - as I got no AFMs - he he Good excuse for some Z45 or Q45 or whatever those wideband ones are called.......

Greddy plenum prolly the way to go - just cause of the way my FMIC piping goes. Plus I agree with keeping all the piping shorter. That's unless Dino discovers a Goldmine. Hears hoping.

You know - apart from the lost $$$ and disapointment of all this - I am still having fun - and that is what counts at the end of the day !

:)

Originally posted by adam 32

yeh thats one rooted motor....

did you check the plugs for signs of detonation?

Adam, I did look at the plugs - but I don't really know what I was looking for - I was expecting to see near brand new plugs cause we replaced them less then 2000kms before the failure.

What I saw was a small rounded end to the centre core - lots of carbon, & very dry - this was on every plug.

The plugs could have been changed on me tho - without me knowing - as they were loose - also this may be because the shop had tested the compression.

Not really sure to be honest.

I really want to find the root cause to my engine failure - only to fix whatever it was that happened.

Thanks all !

Guest mort

B-MAN we had an RB26DETT with exactly the same symptoms as you describe and it ended up being a bore wash problem, someone had tuned the engine extremely rich and washed all the oil of the cylinder walls causing 5 out of 6 pistons to grab the cyl walls be very careful of who is tuning your engine and remember dyno figures don't mean a quick car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...