Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb20 Power Proplems


Recommended Posts

Guest trikdoutvl

hi all i got a rb20det silvertop in my vl its got a fmic 3inch xhaust bleed valve runnin 14psi of boost.. i had it dynoed and it only made 180bhp but everywhere i read says there 215 stock n mines moded n has less power it doesnt make sense.. any ideas?? the motor runs perfect doesnt fell like anythins not rite with it, its just slow. theres a vid of it draggin and dynoing please tell me if the times n power is about right or wrong for that motor thanks

drag

dyno run

hyperdrivereadout2dc7.th.jpghyperdrivereadout1nz1.th.jpgwhitevlrb20turrbozq8.th.jpg

Edited by trikdoutvl
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199566-rb20-power-proplems/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

180hp = 134kw

stock = 160kw at the engine which is 214.4 HP which is 215PS (which the japs use)

THESE FIGURES ARE AT THE ENGINE.

As Roy said, stock R32 gtst makes about 110kw at the wheels.

now.. your figure of 134rwkw with 14psi, exhaust and fmic is on the low side.

However, I'd say that if you got a re-chip for your ecu for about $350 or so, it will make the usual 150-160rwkw.

as a rough guide, I had the same mods as you but using a turbo from RB25 and only 11 psi and NO re-chip, I made 154rwkw.

I'd say that as per usual nissan, all the extra boost you are shoving in it is making it run Paris Hilton style Rich.

a re-chip with fuel removed and timing added will give you great results.

Search for rechip on the forums to see who on here can help you out.

there are a couple of people.

Guest trikdoutvl

kool thanks for the feedback every1 i diddnt think any1 would reply cause its not a skyline n no1 would car...

GTST- ill save my pennies a bit longer and save a apexi power fc i been told there good, are they better then that chip ur talking about......

I did have a blocked catalatic conventer when the dyno run was done would have that cost me power.. since the dyno run ive had the stock blocked cat replaced with a stainless steel hi flow cat and also had all the resinators and mufflers removed so now its a straight threw 3 inch with only a hi flow cat... it sounds awsome on the drag raceing like i got above...

thanks for the feed back every1 :D

The R32 GTST's are every day road cars which run a 4.3:1 diff ratio.

They can get away with a low diff ratio as they rev to 7k. The VL's run with a higher ratio because they only rev to 5.5 6k max unless heavily modified + have a hell of a lot more torque so get the car moving a lot quicker and spool the turbo much quicker.

For example. My old RB20det with its 4.3 diff gears would return mid 10 to 11litres per 100km's. At 100km/h it would sit at ~2850rpm.

In short small capacity motors that rev high NEED low diff ratio's.

If its a everyday car for toodling around the local streets a 4.3:1 is simply awesome. If you live out in the sticks always on 100km/h roads I'd consider a 3.7.

Guest trikdoutvl

damm, 4.3.1 is pretty low, also theres gbox ratios to take into consideration, i can do 160ks in 3rd..... i mite look at getting the ecu next then maybe a rb25 turbo n then if its still slugish the diff ratios swapped... another thing i forgot to mention i took off the power steering pump n pulley n the airconditoning would that muck up the tune

does any1 have 1/4 stats for r32s????????? standard 1s

Edited by trikdoutvl
damm, 4.3.1 is pretty low, also theres gbox ratios to take into consideration, i can do 160ks in 3rd..... i mite look at getting the ecu next then maybe a rb25 turbo n then if its still slugish the diff ratios swapped... another thing i forgot to mention i took off the power steering pump n pulley n the airconditoning would that muck up the tune

does any1 have 1/4 stats for r32s????????? standard 1s

From memory the r32 pulls ~55km/h out of first at 7k; 100km/h out of second and 145km/h out of third.

Standard R32 gtst's run around 14.6-14.9 with 110-120rwkw.

There was one bloke who some how managed to crack a 14.2 years ago with a 100% stocker and good tyres. Probably cheating some how. :(

With ecu, exhaust and around 160-170rwkw they do high 13's to flat/low 14's depending on driver and suspension setup.

The VL exec weighs the same as the R32 GTST so I don't see why it wouldn't pull the same sort of numbers.

Try to skip the rb25 turbo and run some sort of highflow that you can push a solid 18pound in to it through the mid range. This pulls up the mid range and gets the car moving quickly which will most definitely help with the tall gearing.

The rb25det rb20's I've been in all tend to lack a real meaty solid punching mid range; they wind out and have nice top end though.

Guest trikdoutvl

true, im still runnin the vl 5spd box n id say my ratios are quite a bit longer..... im not after a superfast car so im not gonna go for t04e or any turbo like that...

im really frusterated at the moment after spendin 5 grand on gettin the motor happin to do a 15.7,,,, head aches lol................ so wat should i do first???????????? i dont have tons of money so i can only do 1 thing at time thanxs scott

did any1 watch the drag video, do u think it sounds good???

First would be get a rb20 box if they are different and get the diff sorted

For the turbo a high-flowed rb20 or rb25 turbo would be good, let you run lots of boost and without big lag, just find a blown one on here and take it to get high flowed. An SAFC and tune would also help in the short-term if you can't afford the turbo.

Guest trikdoutvl

quick question..

Ive got a pod filter on my car its of the cone shapped 1s that are always on commodores, but most sklyines i see have the mushroom shapped 1s are they better for the rb engines and do they still make the sucking noise, mine makes a really loud sucking noise everytime i accelerate n i dun like it i think its annoying id rather here the turbo spool

inclose it or use a standard airbox. should reduce that noise.

SAFC = Super Air & Fuel Controller it controls your mixture of air and fuel at a fair few points in the rev range.if your on a budget grab 1 of these.

my personal experience showed that 14psi was useless over 12psi just made 1st gear more prone to hitting the limiter and my tuner said NO NO.

i dont know much about the ratio stuff but mine seems perfect(auto r32gtst) only uses 3 gears over 400m last time i went and didnt have to use 4th.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...