Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dave, Haha, 205's are going to be great, make sure you pump them up to 50psi :P

We should make a new 'pizza cutter' racing category. A points based system where you need to do a 4 wheel burnout the entire length of the track.

I've missed tonight due to my fridge blowing up on me this afternoon. :thumbsup:

well, had a very bad night :( . No traction (doing .240 60ft'er all night) and didn't even manage to get into the 13 sec bracket ;) . could'nt get any faster than 162km at end of track. only good thing was got 13 runs in. met sidewayssam, he done very well considering conditions. will let him tell you his times (that skyline goes well for 260rwhp).

well, had a very bad night :( . No traction (doing .240 60ft'er all night) and didn't even manage to get into the 13 sec bracket ;) . could'nt get any faster than 162km at end of track. only good thing was got 13 runs in. met sidewayssam, he done very well considering conditions. will let him tell you his times (that skyline goes well for 260rwhp).

At least you had a good time, I think thats the important thing more than the times. :)

@162km/h terminal I would say you were down on power for the night Vs your old 13.7 run in your signature. How did the car feel? Have you changed anything since last time?

Eric, I've been since my 13.7 with you and I didnt do well either - car feels shithouse now.

Upped the boost (Blitz Spec R) and SAFC Neo. dyno'd at 293rwhp you'd think I could manage a low 13...

Best I could do was a 13.9 and a 2.3 60ft >_<

Eric, I've been since my 13.7 with you and I didnt do well either - car feels shithouse now.

Upped the boost (Blitz Spec R) and SAFC Neo. dyno'd at 293rwhp you'd think I could manage a low 13...

Best I could do was a 13.9 and a 2.3 60ft >_<

You aren't making anywhere near 293rwhp at the track bt the looks. what was the terminal speed?

At least you had a good time, I think thats the important thing more than the times. >_<

@162km/h terminal I would say you were down on power for the night Vs your old 13.7 run in your signature. How did the car feel? Have you changed anything since last time?

that was the only night i had traction straight of the line. was very humid last night so this may be the reason the power was down a bit. if i was getting better 60fters (2.10 or better)i recon i would have been down around the mid 13ns. even the cars running semis were getting bad 60fters as well(up to .220). alot of guys were complaining about the track prep saying it was very slippery. i think it comes down to shite tyres = shite times. i had a quick check of my slips and i had a best terminal of 164kmph

Edited by Pal

Around 100-103mph I think, don't have the sheets with me.

The 13.7 was with a 3" catback, fmic and uncovered pod. Found out later the car was running lean from dying fuel pump..

Timeslip: http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a71/br4nc...8thAPRIL001.jpg

Dyno: http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a71/br4nc...ng_dyno0001.jpg

So since then I've done Tomei fuel pump, splitfire coilpacks, 3" dump/front/cat, safc neo, ebc, plus a bit more weight from a stereo although i had the sub out. And 265/35/18s all round at the moment, need to change those front tyres.

Recent Dyno: http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a71/br4nc...g_dyno_2001.jpg

Around 100-103mph I think, don't have the sheets with me.

The 13.7 was with a 3" catback, fmic and uncovered pod. Found out later the car was running lean from dying fuel pump..

Timeslip: http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a71/br4nc...8thAPRIL001.jpg

Dyno: http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a71/br4nc...ng_dyno0001.jpg

So since then I've done Tomei fuel pump, splitfire coilpacks, 3" dump/front/cat, safc neo, ebc, plus a bit more weight from a stereo although i had the sub out. And 265/35/18s all round at the moment, need to change those front tyres.

Recent Dyno: http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a71/br4nc...g_dyno_2001.jpg

103mph is a mid 13 and doesn't equal 293rwhp. It's a fair whack less hp than that at the track. Dyno's are really only a tuning aid anyway so no big deal. The good news is there is enough in the car for a mid 13 without too much dramas. You have 265's , just let some air out and with a little warm up you should get off the line quicker. :/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...