Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dont forget to take your keyboard when you go 'see' his 'mate'.

You've been warned. Personal threats will not be tolerated.

i wasnt threatening anyone... it was just a friendly f**k you dont call me a retard

What size cams and what headwork are you 'planning'?

That Tomei stroker kit is only the 8 counter kit and the 'cooling channel kit' is actually only an extra option regarding pistons. Everthing else is the same.

Do you actully need a stroker? Plenty of guys are running rb26's with TO4Z's and are making the required power.

technically no i dont need the stroker kit but with the extra displacement which would provide more torque with the longer stroke and so forth you know where im coming from....

u have for sale it says an 05u block with hks 2.8lt stroker bottom end was the o5u bit stand for

head work im not really sure i still gotta speak to sum ppl about where i should start and wat is need as such

ummm 270's with _____lift was my first choice but im not sure if i could go for a lil bit bigger in the vacinity of 280's theres biggish but yeh im just unsure at this point

plus call me a dick but ya cant beat the cammy skyline note gotta love it

Edited by skylinekid

oooww - feisty thread!

...ya cant beat the cammy skyline note gotta love it

Hell yes ;)

280's are massive on a small capacity import motor though. What ever you do decide, make sure you do your research. Strokers, cams and turbo clearly dictate the nature of the car when done. With only two driven wheels, your planned use for the vehicle needs some good thinking.

u have for sale it says an 05u block with hks 2.8lt stroker bottom end was the o5u bit stand for

Tis the code given to the normal, run of the mill RB26's. I.e. not N1 or GT block. Theres some good info on SAU regarding this.

Edited by GeeTR
I have the tomei stroker hidden in a GT block.

Turbo's are HKS GT RS's with Tomei Procams 270 @ 10.25mm with a ported head.

Fullboost (1.65 bar) @ 4800 RPM in 4th (give or take 100 RPM)

Wouldnt change a thing. At times i wish i had maybe 2530's but it really isnt that bad.

personally i would be pissed with that kinda boost response....

try 1.8bar at about 4000rpm in 4th from a 2.6l with no head porting and a t04z

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...