Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb26 With 2.8lt Stroker Kit, Cam And Headwork. Turbo Choices

skylinekid

By skylinekid,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

skylinekid Proficient

skylinekid

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Dont forget to take your keyboard when you go 'see' his 'mate'.

You've been warned. Personal threats will not be tolerated.

i wasnt threatening anyone... it was just a friendly f**k you dont call me a retard

skylinekid Proficient

skylinekid

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
What size cams and what headwork are you 'planning'?

That Tomei stroker kit is only the 8 counter kit and the 'cooling channel kit' is actually only an extra option regarding pistons. Everthing else is the same.

Do you actully need a stroker? Plenty of guys are running rb26's with TO4Z's and are making the required power.

technically no i dont need the stroker kit but with the extra displacement which would provide more torque with the longer stroke and so forth you know where im coming from....

u have for sale it says an 05u block with hks 2.8lt stroker bottom end was the o5u bit stand for

head work im not really sure i still gotta speak to sum ppl about where i should start and wat is need as such

ummm 270's with _____lift was my first choice but im not sure if i could go for a lil bit bigger in the vacinity of 280's theres biggish but yeh im just unsure at this point

plus call me a dick but ya cant beat the cammy skyline note gotta love it

Edited by skylinekid
GeeTR Grand Master

GeeTR

Posted
Posted (edited)

oooww - feisty thread!

...ya cant beat the cammy skyline note gotta love it

Hell yes ;)

280's are massive on a small capacity import motor though. What ever you do decide, make sure you do your research. Strokers, cams and turbo clearly dictate the nature of the car when done. With only two driven wheels, your planned use for the vehicle needs some good thinking.

u have for sale it says an 05u block with hks 2.8lt stroker bottom end was the o5u bit stand for

Tis the code given to the normal, run of the mill RB26's. I.e. not N1 or GT block. Theres some good info on SAU regarding this.

Edited by GeeTR
SimonR32 Grand Master

SimonR32

Posted
Posted
I have the tomei stroker hidden in a GT block.

Turbo's are HKS GT RS's with Tomei Procams 270 @ 10.25mm with a ported head.

Fullboost (1.65 bar) @ 4800 RPM in 4th (give or take 100 RPM)

Wouldnt change a thing. At times i wish i had maybe 2530's but it really isnt that bad.

personally i would be pissed with that kinda boost response....

try 1.8bar at about 4000rpm in 4th from a 2.6l with no head porting and a t04z

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sinn3r
      R34 Skyline climate control unit transistor

      By sinn3r · Posted

      Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • GTSBoy
      Best place to order Authetic R32 Parts in Japan

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...