Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yesterday I put on a hks pod filter on my stock r33 series II. and blocked the hose going in to the stock blowoff valve (a mate told me it would sound mad) it actually sounds like a wrx in a way (I suggest trying it).

but ever since i put the car in this configuration, I feel a loss of power. any suggestions on why this is happening??

I thought that I should get an increase in power just by putting the pod on!!!

I thought about it and I'm thinking that maybe the standard exhaust is not copping with the amount of air that going in.

I didn't reset the ecu, i wouldn't have thought that it would be that bigger difference. I could be wrong??

anyway any suggestions would be welcome.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2020-pod-filter-probs/
Share on other sites

Dood, if you'be blocked the hose running out of the stock BOV that means that basically you are not using a BOV at all..which is a very very bad thing to do..hurts ya turbo a lot heeh

and yeah a simple air filter wont nab you any free power...

exhaust would though...

mc

:shake:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2020-pod-filter-probs/#findComment-37516
Share on other sites

if the hose you blocked is the little one leading from the plenum then you problem is that the standard BOV blows open at about 5psi without this little hose connected

so thats where you loose your power the spring alone isnt strong enough to keep it closed on its own it needs the pressure that comes i from that hose to help it stay shut

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2020-pod-filter-probs/#findComment-37616
Share on other sites

Stop hot air getting in there and you might notice a slight improvement.?!?!?!

I'm not going to worry about going a pod filter.

It didn't show any power gain (1rwkw wow) on the dyno compared to the std air box with a bigger cold air intake and decent panel filter.

It might show more of a power increase when I start getting up around the 200rwkw mark btw.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2020-pod-filter-probs/#findComment-38975
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...