Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

For some time now whenever I try to use the search function, specifically the 'more search options' the page loads up and then freezes and eventually timesout. I get the hourglass symbol and then the error report. Has been this way for a few weeks. No other problems seem to occur. Just when I use the search function.

Cheers

David aka writeoff

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203329-search-function-error/
Share on other sites

What browser?

Whats the error?

Works for me from latest Firefox and IE, so i'd take a stab at

1. Your using IE

2. Its something to do with security settings

Let us know more info :glare:

Thanks for getting back to me.

You're right that I'm using IE. I've only ever used IE.

RE security settings. I haven't changed anything. I run Symantic Corporate edition AV, Spybot & ad-adware 2007. Recently I have been getting a lot of internet dropouts & Internode (my ISP) want me to change my modem before sending a tech out. I had a virus appear about 1-2 weeks ago but it was picked up by my AV and deleted. I update & run all 3 anti-X programs daily.

As for the error itself the 'More Search Options' page loads up and I can type about 8-10 letters before the hour glass symbol appears and remains until I end the program through Task Manager. It dosen't give me any specific info other than "application not responding". I have left it running for >30 mins with no change. I'm pretty computer illiterate so I realise that I'm not really helping you much. Sorry. But it is frustrating as I use the search function a lot which you, perhaps more than anyone else on SAU, can appreciate. :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...