Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

nope, I had one, leaned out at 280rwkw and above.

at 300rwkw, the afrs wouldn't go below 12.8:1, even with the injectors completely maxed in the power FC.

Have you seen the flow chart? Watch the blue line below 60psi.... Terrible!

post-7271-1202125347_thumb.jpg

Edited by The Mafia
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204507-walbro-255/#findComment-3623796
Share on other sites

mine saw the end of its performance @ 240-250rwkw

Walbro's are a mixed bag.

Sometimes they work, sometimes they dont... i wasnt even running upped rail pressures over normal conditions

There are FAR too many threads now with people and Walbros who have fuel issues.

I simply dont trust them. Have used Bosch for the lasf 4 years since.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204507-walbro-255/#findComment-3623867
Share on other sites

mine was ok, just ran out of flow.

Remember the ratings -

Walboro 255 is 255lph at 40psi

Nismo 275lph is at 275lph at 70psi (What I have now)

Nismo is a perfect pump, drops straight in like factory, has a factory bracket, hoses and plug etc. I'll never touch a bosche.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204507-walbro-255/#findComment-3623933
Share on other sites

mine was ok, just ran out of flow.

Remember the ratings -

Walboro 255 is 255lph at 40psi

Nismo 275lph is at 275lph at 70psi (What I have now)

Nismo is a perfect pump, drops straight in like factory, has a factory bracket, hoses and plug etc. I'll never touch a bosche.

and walbro rate there pumps at a voltage which isnt achieved in a "normal" car, sneaky haha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204507-walbro-255/#findComment-3623991
Share on other sites

Have you seen the flow chart? Watch the blue line below 60psi.... Terrible!

whats terrible about it? i dont look at fuel flow graphs often but it seems to flow a fair bit below 60psi? its above 60 that it really drops off. and why does more pressure result in less flow? i thought mroe pressure would mean more flow?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204507-walbro-255/#findComment-3626197
Share on other sites

yeah well think about it - rail pressure is 42psi + your boost (maybe 12psi?)

Thats a total of 54psi fuel pressure needed to drive the injectors. I don't know about you but thats putting the pump on edge and I wouldn't risk it.

Its a POS.

Actually, it was meant for NA applications..... Its pretty obvious..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204507-walbro-255/#findComment-3626344
Share on other sites

I am in the same dilema but I want something for 400-440wkw

My opinion is.... two walbros!!! Two walbros are cheaper than one 044! Here in Greece my mechanic said me that he saw many 044 to broke.. and aeromotive to broke...!! So he said me that with all pumps we have the danger to broke!

They broke either if you stay without fuel or if you leave the fuel for very long time (one aeromotive broke with the last way)!

If one of your two walbro damaged the other will work :D

So more safe!! :P

As I understand here in australian you don't use walbros... Here in Greece all people untill 500 fly hp use one walbro!

All are happy untill 500 with one walbro... too much scooby, evo etc!

After 500 you need a decent fuel setup as many people here told me what to do (surge tank solution with total 3 pumps)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204507-walbro-255/#findComment-3626710
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I might just check it out.. A Q among all those skylines.. lol
    • Time will tell, they're doing all the admin stuff at the moment. I've submitted all the required details, photos, etc.   I was under the impression that DC coupling is the best approach, i.e.: Solar Array -> Battery Invertor -> Battery  Where as AC Coupling is simpler, however less efficient, i.e.: Solar Array -> Solar Invertor -> Battery Invertor -> Battery
    • The price is really great for that kind of capacity. I thought similar setups cost way more. How's your efficiency been with the DC-coupling? I've heard sometimes there can be a bit of a performance loss.
    • Long time no random post about shit. So I went down this deep deep rabbit hole of battery storage for the home, ended up locking in a 41.9kWh Fox ESS EQ4800 with 9 units stacked. Battery uses Lithium Iron Phosphate, similar to what you find in those deep cycle boat/caravan batteries. And yes, why did I go with a cheapie brand and not like Synergy? simply because I don't plan to stay at this house for more than another 3~5 years.  The entire install, DC coupling (removal of existing invertor, connecting the current 6.6kW array direct to the battery invertor), new 8kW invertor is $6K all up (after all the rebates etc.). Going with this lot: https://www.aussiesolarbatteries.com.au/ It did seem a bit too good to be true, however seems like the Whirlpool community has vetted it and when it comes to this kind of stuff, they seem to be all over it: https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/thread/9pxj8482?p=38   I've requested for the battery to be installed outside, next to my meter board and not inside - rather have it combust and ignite outside lol.    
    • In Vic it would be a defect regardless of whether or not you cut a hole in the sheetmetal for the return pipe. The rules in Vic are shitful, and are generally interpreted as you can "make 2 mods to the intake system". Putting an FFP and an FMI onto it will almost certainly be seen as some huge number of intake mods. You really need to speak to an engineer before doing this stuff in VIC.
×
×
  • Create New...