Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

pin outs are the same, speak to an auto-elec... could work? i don't know if the ATESSA system would show a fault code tho... I think it uses TPS amongst other things

na it must be stagea. the pin outs are diffrent, i have had a guy look at it. iv searched japan, NOTHING there, iv been doing this converesion 4 8months, i just want it finished

Not sure why you need a stagea ecu?

AWD series 2 NEO stagea's do not have traction control. RWD series 2 neo stagea's do have traction control

Which engine do you have? AWD or RWD

I have series 2 awd stagea and have just fitted a r34 GTT power fc. Everything works fine with the r34 power Fc. They only problem the power FC is looking for the traction control which does not exist, so it throws up the engine check light. There is a simple wiring trick to be done to turn the light off. It is covered in the Stagea section.

I do not want to sell my stock ecu, but if you need one post wanted ecu in the stagea classifieds

Not sure why you need a stagea ecu?

AWD series 2 NEO stagea's do not have traction control. RWD series 2 neo stagea's do have traction control

Which engine do you have? AWD or RWD

I have series 2 awd stagea and have just fitted a r34 GTT power fc. Everything works fine with the r34 power Fc. They only problem the power FC is looking for the traction control which does not exist, so it throws up the engine check light. There is a simple wiring trick to be done to turn the light off. It is covered in the Stagea section.

I do not want to sell my stock ecu, but if you need one post wanted ecu in the stagea classifieds

hay! thanks for the info. im still learning this web site. will try find where to post it. ah well the engine was 4wd, but i converted it to rwd. i have sent it so some peopole to try wire up but they said standerd 25det ecu will not fit.

hay! thanks for the info. im still learning this web site. will try find where to post it. ah well the engine was 4wd, but i converted it to rwd. i have sent it so some peopole to try wire up but they said standerd 25det ecu will not fit.

My first post i assumed you used a neo series 2 stagea engine as you have a r34 that uses a neo normally.

I am now guessing you have used a series 1 stagea engine which is the non neo and is the same as a R33gtst series 2. Even thuo the stagea series 1 engine is the same as the series 2 R33 engine, in all stagea's they use a R34 plug on the end of the engine harness, that is why the ecu (assume you are using a R33) will not plug in. Best to get hold of a series 1 stagea ecu and it will plug in and work. Try Duncan or Beastin as they have a series 1 stagea converted to power FC in below thread.

This attached thread may help you, which out lines some of the series 1 and 2 stagea loom differences

Mainly some injector pinout diffences

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...ly-t205298.html

My first post i assumed you used a neo series 2 stagea engine as you have a r34 that uses a neo normally.

I am now guessing you have used a series 1 stagea engine which is the non neo and is the same as a R33gtst series 2. Even thuo the stagea series 1 engine is the same as the series 2 R33 engine, in all stagea's they use a R34 plug on the end of the engine harness, that is why the ecu (assume you are using a R33) will not plug in. Best to get hold of a series 1 stagea ecu and it will plug in and work. Try Duncan or Beastin as they have a series 1 stagea converted to power FC in below thread.

This attached thread may help you, which out lines some of the series 1 and 2 stagea loom differences

Mainly some injector pinout diffences

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...ly-t205298.html

ok thanks. ah my stagea engine is a ...97 from memory.

not realy. the guy said ( series one runs ignitor pack, mine doesnt)

Wrong.

Only the early series 1 r33 gtst rb25 ran a seperate ignitor pack 1993-1994

The series 1 stagea and series 2 r33 does run a seperate ignitor pack, it is built into the coils

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...