Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I say go for it too...tint it! Slightly different shades is better than no tint at all...

Here's a pic of mine...darkest legal 3M tint on the front, rears are factory tint from Japan as per usual..not very noticeable..still looks good.

IMG_1503.jpg

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I got the darkest legal tint done about a week ago. Mastertint $300 lifetime warranty etc. The car looks sooo much better and yes it does look really dark on the outside, but i dont really have any problems seeing out of it from the inside, even at night im not struggling. And as long as cops can see in somewhat they wont harass u

Also u dont need to use your aircon as much and u can root away no problems

Dont bother keeping that old tint, just rip it all out

Tint it!

People are stating that it would look weird having a slightly lighter tint on the doors, however it currently has no tint, which is an even bigger contrast. Sure it's a very JDM look, but outside of Japan, it just looks plain wierd to most whom aren't used to seeing it.

I've owned cars with no tint before, and you definately want some privacy sometimes,.... I tend to drive with my windows down alot of the time, but just having the option to put the windows up and be less visible is comforting.

As n15m0 stated, having slightly different shades is better than no tint at all.

It already is extremely contrasted, lessening it won't be wierd at all. Anyways, even having the same tint all round, the doors always appear somewhat lighter, since they are bigger than the quarter windows, with more light coming through in combination with all that light shining through an untinted front window.

At least this way, if you like the darker tint from Japan, it won't be as obvious when a cop pulls up beside you, because he will still be able to see you through the door windows which would be legal, thus they won't really question the legality of the Japanese tint as much.

Either this, or replace tint to make all windows conform,.. but do tint it, you won't regret tinting.

Got a quote to tint my windows today. $350 for somewhere between the darkest legal and limosine. It looks really good. This thread put the idea into my mind, and then I noticed the top of my rear seats were badly faded, and that was it. Should have it on in a few weeks, I'll post pics when it's done. It'll look so much better!

Seems that the consensus is that I tint 'em! :banana:

Thanks for all the replies and ideas - I'll get the tint done within the next few weeks.

First job off the rank next week is replacing my 3 week old Xforce muffler with a Varex muffler

(wish I did this to begin with but was talked out of it!)

The current muffler is sometimes just too loud/boomy and with the silencer fitted, too restricted - so the Varex seems a much better compromise - the only negative is that the existing system is 3.5" and the biggest currently available Varex is 3"... but I feel it'll have minimum impact.

I've done a lot of reading on the subject and I think the Varex will be okay just as long as common sense is used...

So I'll have a near new muffler up for sale soon I hope :)

Erm, oh yeah... we were talking about tinting weren't we?!?

Man, theres no end to the stuff that I 'need' to do to this Skyline, lol.

  • 2 weeks later...

Done deal :)

Quite a bit lighter but it's as dark as the law allows.

Not a great phone piccy but gives you an idea of the new tint:gallery_46181_2320_40845.jpg

Off to the detailers on Monday to get some swirls taken out of the paintwork, plus a general buff & tidy up of minor scratches. I saw a red 2000 model Commode there that had the same treatment, and the paintwork looked brand new.

Edited by Wayne_J

Legal tint is kinda gay. No offence, but all my mates have it and it really doesnt look that great. I prefer it when it makes it difficult to look into the car, so 20% or less, but that is just me. In WA we dont have 2 go over the pits to re-regester a car, so we dont really have a problem with illegal cars, unless the cops pull you over. Is that what happens over there tho? Or am I badly mistaken?

I'll be getting that Midnight Express (35%) tint on Monday on my 34, I'll post a pic just for other people's reference who are considering it once it's done.

http://www.tintacar.com.au/autofilm_midnight.shtml

Yup, I should mention that I got 'Midnight Express' on mine yesterday.

Glad I did, made quite a difference inside and visibility still seems good.

Oh and BTW the Midnight Express tint matches the original Japanese tint in tone nicely.

Edited by Wayne_J
Legal tint is kinda gay. No offence, but all my mates have it and it really doesnt look that great. I prefer it when it makes it difficult to look into the car, so 20% or less, but that is just me. In WA we dont have 2 go over the pits to re-regester a car, so we dont really have a problem with illegal cars, unless the cops pull you over. Is that what happens over there tho? Or am I badly mistaken?

Yeah, the darker tint looks nice from the outside, I agree.

But from the inside, its not necessarily as practical when it is dark.

I really didn't want to add yet another visibly illegal mod to my car, Skylines are cop-magnets as it is...

I'm trying to keep the appearance of mine as stock as possible, the exhaust looks almost stock (and I can hit the remote to quieten it if need be), the front mount intercooler isn't very obvious - the only thing on mine that is obvious are the staggered wheels (18x9, 18x10).

I really do not feel like getting a defect and having to put it over the pits, so I'm not going to risk it all just for some dark tint. I'd rather take chances with things that enhance the performance :thumbsup:

I dont blame you, I'm sure most ppl are in the same boat, but I have only ever seen one cop from 100m away when I'm in my car. Just lucky I guess. I'm still young, so defects dont worry me just yet.

My mate had 5% limo tint and our work ute has 20% tint and you don't have trouble looking through the windows at night. You get used to it. If your having too much trouble, just wind down a window.

But as I have said so many times, its your car your decicion. I'll have to take my car over the pits WAY before you ever will!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...