Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey I have a question regarding the MAF's on a gts.

If you had this setup being installed.... how would you control the MAF.. like upgrade to z32 maf?

not really sure what to do because we are going for about 250-300kw.

Stock RB20

Plazmaman Huge intake plenum

Roccos%20RB20%20100_2428.jpg

FMIC kit

Greddy BOV

garrett t04s 60-1 turbo BB

Top mount t04 manifold

650cc injectors

Walbro 255

greddy metal headgasket

arp headstuds

HD clutch

E-manage

3" test pipe

3.5" Cat back

3" custom downpipe

HKS Wastegate @ 15psi

Can the e-manage make the stock MAF work for this kind of HP?

or what do i need to do for the MAF situation...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208573-rb20-problem-solving-help/
Share on other sites

if the afm is maxing out you can use the pressure sensor with the emanage, you can clamp the maf signal of the afm when it maxes out and then use the map signal from the pressure sensor. emanage has this feature.

this is only if your afm isn't currently creating a big restriction in your intake, which it probably would be with the power your chasing. which you could then look at the z32 or q45 afms. which will work with the emanage. or even a afm bypass, but i haven't seen this done with an emanage before, only full aftermarket ecu's.

Edited by QWK32
if the afm is maxing out you can use the pressure sensor with the emanage, you can clamp the maf signal of the afm when it maxes out and then use the map signal from the pressure sensor. emanage has this feature.

this is only if your afm isn't currently creating a big restriction in your intake, which it probably would be with the power your chasing. which you could then look at the z32 or q45 afms. which will work with the emanage. or even a afm bypass, but i haven't seen this done with an emanage before, only full aftermarket ecu's.

thanks for the suggestions..

what did you mean by i can Clamp the maf signal when it maxes out and then use the cap signal of the pressure sensor?

It can read two at once? or one after the other?

thanks for the suggestions..

what did you mean by i can Clamp the maf signal when it maxes out and then use the cap signal of the pressure sensor?

It can read two at once? or one after the other?

buy clamp the signal i mean it locks the signal voltage at a little bit lower than the max voltage. so the ecu doesn't think its maxed out and hit cut. this makes the ecu output enough fuel and timing to run it at say 95% air flow. then the emanage will use the map (mass air pressure) sensor to take its reading from, and you have to tune it for the extra fuel and timing you need for anything after this point.

so its like what you said, it uses one after the other.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
×
×
  • Create New...