Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey

I am putting a new turbo setup onto my RB20 but just had a quick question in regards to vac lines for external wategates

Where do the vac lines from the top and side of the wastegate go?

Also if I want to hook up a bleed valve how do I go about doing that?

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/209018-external-wastegate-lines/
Share on other sites

If you are using just a manual boost controller (ie bleed valve etc) or no boost controller you connect the vacuum / boost line to the base of the WG actuator. It opens the WG when positive pressure is applied...The top connection when pressurised acts to hold the WG shut so dont use this one...

Some or most electronic boost controller use both. They do this so that they can hold the WG closed for longer...

The top connection also acts as a breather so make sure you dont block it off other wise the WG wont work properly....

:)

Now for the other question, where does that boost line come from as RB20 doesn't have a solenoid and the front of the turbo doesn't have an outlet for a vac line

Do I take it off the cooler piping somewhere, or can I hook it up off the intake manifold?

Ok I have to say I am slightly confused now

The yellow line I can't run to the comp cover because it doesn't have an outlet on the front of my turbo

The blue line to the cooler piping is there standard so I assume I don't have to worry about that?

The red line, where is that coming from is or is just a hose connected to nothing?

Would the bleed valve connect in-line with the yellow line?

post-11894-1204671371_thumb.jpg

Okay so the yellow line will be T pieced off the blue line

Now the red line is that coming off the intake manifold also? And how to I tap a bleed valve between the red and blue?

Sorry for questions, just want to get it right the first time!

Picture updated with my outstanding MS Paint skills

post-11894-1204675078_thumb.jpg

That diagram looks as if it is for an EBC set up???

I would not connect the top line because in your setup it should just be open or a breather...Take one line from your IC pipe work and connect it to the base of the WG actuator...make sure this works first and then worry about the bleed valve..

Do you know what size spring is in your wastegate?? It may be just give you the boost you want with the nedd for the bleed valve....also do you realise you can get different springs for external WGs...

That diagram looks as if it is for an EBC set up???

I would not connect the top line because in your setup it should just be open or a breather...Take one line from your IC pipe work and connect it to the base of the WG actuator...make sure this works first and then worry about the bleed valve..

Do you know what size spring is in your wastegate?? It may be just give you the boost you want with the nedd for the bleed valve....also do you realise you can get different springs for external WGs...

ah ok now I have no idea what to do now lol

I am not too sure what spring it is, its an old school style HKS gate, but not interested in changing springs

I would rather just bleed it to what I need and leave it there

I need it to run like 19psi but for initial tune about 12psi

Anyways not relavent, I just need to know how to hook it up with a bleed valve then I will work out the rest once its on the dyno

ah ok now I have no idea what to do now lol

I am not too sure what spring it is, its an old school style HKS gate, but not interested in changing springs

I would rather just bleed it to what I need and leave it there

I need it to run like 19psi but for initial tune about 12psi

Anyways not relavent, I just need to know how to hook it up with a bleed valve then I will work out the rest once its on the dyno

Just remember that it is impossible to achieve boost below the psi of what the spring is...ie if someone has put a 19psi spring in you cannot achieve 12psi...some external gates come standard with pretty big springs...they are generally colour coded to nominate the psi of the spring...

Just remember that it is impossible to achieve boost below the psi of what the spring is...ie if someone has put a 19psi spring in you cannot achieve 12psi...some external gates come standard with pretty big springs...they are generally colour coded to nominate the psi of the spring...

Yep not a problem, thanks for that

I might pop it open and take a look, but doubt it would be anything to high

I just need to get the lines right pretty much then the tuner can play with the boost and set it to what he wants

I've always been a fan of trying to get the spring tension such that you acheive the right boost with just a little bit of bleed, as opposed to using a light spring and bleeding off heaps of air..Bleeding of heaps of air I dont think is the way to go because there are more variations that can occur...

ie bleed valve can move and will behave differently if moved to a different spot in the engine bay and runs at a heaps different temperature...

Also technically the bleed valve is a boost leak so you should always seek to minimise this...

You should consider a good EBC in the near future...

lol, sorry man, was just taking the piss outa taxi :D

As mentioned, turbo outlet to bottom half of WG. Top side leave free ( you can purchase little cork filters, to stop shite from getting in there)

You'd hook it up, the same way as all bleeders I would think. Check TurboSmarts nice little PDF

Doesnt matter u dont a T there... anywhere between turbs and throttle body will do.

Cheers

Edited by GeeTR
Lets just not worry about the type of boost controller for the moment

For now I just need to know how to hook the vac lines up properly to the external gate so I can run the bleed valve and control the boost properly

:D

For your purposes I would just treat the external WG as if it was an internal one but just make sure you use the bottom vacuum line connection...Leave the top one open and dont connect anything to it...You then just use the bleed valve as if you had an internal gate...This will work just the same.....The bleed valve wont know any difference...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...