Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i believe i heard that the compliance laws were changed and no longer required for 32's due to the shape of the front corner indicators.

my r32 gtr which is just complied about half a year ago doesnt have a side indicator put on. however i dunno its becoz the laws were changed or the compliance place being dodgy ...

my r32 gtr which is just complied about half a year ago doesnt have a side indicator put on. however i dunno its becoz the laws were changed or the compliance place being dodgy ...

im pretty sure its the laws/regs, as they dont put in the fuel filler restrictors anymore due to there being no leaded petrol available (just means they have reviewed it is all)

either way though you just confirmed they arent needed for blue slips so i guess he's good to go :)

read somewhere that its up to each compliance plac as to whether they put the indicators on the fenders because of the shape of the front indicators.

As long as you can see the front indicators up to a certain angle you dont need to put side ones in.

Thats the reason they didnt put any on my 32 when it was complianced

well ive got them on my gtr and its a late 93, my cousin has a early 93 gtst and his has them, a friend has a 91 model gtst and his hasnt got them...

and every1 i looked at when i was looking to buy mine seemed to differ depending on year model...

what model is your car fugi ? or any1 elses for that matter

yea i while ago someone told me it depends on the year. cauz my mate had a 87 or somethin like that and he didnt.. mine is 92..

im just goin to take them off and see what happens. if i cant get a roadworthy after ill be sure to post somethin up so other people dont do the same.. lol

thanks for ur replys

yea i while ago someone told me it depends on the year. cauz my mate had a 87 or somethin like that and he didnt.. mine is 92..

im just goin to take them off and see what happens. if i cant get a roadworthy after ill be sure to post somethin up so other people dont do the same.. lol

thanks for ur replys

mate just do it.. i doubt you will have any troubles...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...