Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Is that with a manifold adaptor or manifold, or a second hand kit?

Price the parts individually. The turbo is around 3K, the wastegate only 600? (seems pretty cheap) therefore they would have to be giving you a manifold worth 2.2K for 200?. If they did this every day, they wouldnt be in business very long.

Not knocking what you are saying Lepperfish, so please dont take offence - you did ask what people think:) I think someone has been miss quoting things to you, or you have the absolute deal of the century.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21041-gt3540/#findComment-443134
Share on other sites

Will an adapter plate be sweet ? And what size wastegate would you reccommend then ? If you say the 38mm is too small.

If the adapter plate to fit the gt3540 turbo to the standard manifold was a feasible option, then why would anyone pay $2200 for the aftermarket manifold ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21041-gt3540/#findComment-443573
Share on other sites

adaptor plate works, manifold (if made properly) works better.

If GCG offer any guarantees about the wastegate then go for it. I am fitting a 40mm gate with HKS 3037 turbo, I think it should be ok, time will tell.

Size of the gate isnt everything, it depends to some degree on the size of the turbine AR and how the wastegate is plumbed in relation to the exhaust gas flow as well. If they sell the gate matched to the turbo and manifold/adaptor - if it dont work, take it back. $600 for a new gate is pretty bloody cheap.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21041-gt3540/#findComment-443640
Share on other sites

Sounds like a good deal to me:

this is what i worked out.

GT3540s are not around 3K

in fact you can buy them retail for around the LOW 2K ($2225) mark (this is RRP):

http://www.rpmperformancecentre.com.au/Turbos.htm

g

Now if its a custom manifold your looking at (at a minimum) $1K. dont spend over $1400 on this.

And wastgate your looking at around $600

so i assume this is not fitted (otherwise its EXTREAMLY cheap):

Turbo:2225

Pipes: 1000

Wasgt:600

------------------

$3825 (pretty close to the money)

cheers,

trev

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21041-gt3540/#findComment-444237
Share on other sites

The size of the wastegate isn't everything, but it is still important to use a correctly matched wastegate for the sized turbo. I think a 38mm wastegate for such a large turbo as the GT3540 is too small. They really should supply a 50mm wastegate at least. The wastegate should match the flow of the turbo. So I guess a larger turbo would require a larger wastegate for better boost control.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21041-gt3540/#findComment-444545
Share on other sites

Originally posted by raist60

Think about the physics dude. It has nothing to do with turbo size its to do with engine flow. I am also fairly confident GCG know their shit, so why is everyone questioning them?

Can't larger turbos flow more air because of the larger size of the turbo? I'm pretty sure of that. Think of it this way, a small hose flowing air through it with a small valve to bleed off excess air. If you have a much larger hose flowing air through it with the same sized valve then there is obviously going to be more pressure built up at the small valve and hence restrict flow of the air. Using a larger sized valve for the larger hose will let more air flow out at a lower pressure which will not restrict air flow as much. Now in my analogy, replace hose with turbo and valve with wastegate.

I agree that GCG know their stuff, as they seem a reputable company...but what about HKS? I am pretty sure they know a thing or two about turbo systems too :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21041-gt3540/#findComment-444622
Share on other sites

Originally posted by EVOIV

Steve: If you are interested in wastegate sizes, the external wastegate that I got with my 3037S kit has a 50mm outlet. It's the racing wastegate with stainless steel flange. Not the top of the range HKS GT wastegate (that has a 60mm outlet), one below that. Which wastegate are you getting?

What size is the actual vavle? I believe that this is the normal way to express the size of a wastegate. Mine is a 40mm HKS Standard gate. It may be a bit small, but I thought I would give it a bash and upgrade if boost creep happens.

Bigger compressors do flow more, but the gasses have to leave through the turbine, which also needs to be taken into consideration when sizing wastegates.

for example, if you put a turbo on a car, and the turbine was so big that it only build 1.2 bar of boost, and you wanted to run only 1 bar of boost, you wouldnt need a wastegate at all. Silly example I know, but it is purely for demonstration:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21041-gt3540/#findComment-444654
Share on other sites

I have a 50mm HKS external wastegate. If you go to the HKS USA website, it's called the "Racing Wastegate S/S". The wastegates come with different springs, and mine was the 1.3bar one I think. It was too strong for my application, so a local mechanic put in a different spring (I think) so that the wastegate opens at a lower boost level.

Just found out that there's a new GTII Wastegate, looks very nice!!! :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21041-gt3540/#findComment-444677
Share on other sites

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by JNR24

Sounds like a good deal to me:

this is what i worked out.

GT3540s are not around 3K

in fact you can buy them retail for around the LOW 2K ($2225) mark (this is RRP):

http://www.rpmperformancecentre.com.au/Turbos.htm

g

Now if its a custom manifold your looking at (at a minimum) $1K. dont spend over $1400 on this.

And wastgate your looking at around $600

so i assume this is not fitted (otherwise its EXTREAMLY cheap):

Turbo:2225

Pipes: 1000

Wasgt:600

------------------

$3825  (pretty close to the money)

cheers,

trev

u recon u can get the manifold made in steam pipes for around $1400?? if so give me some names in melbourne that can do it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21041-gt3540/#findComment-446191
Share on other sites

Sub zero performance (there in quensland & web-sites down??) they have custom tuned port pipes, for rb25 for $1400 dude. You might have to pay they a bit extra for a adapter plate if you need one made. i think they bolt up to t3 flange & its a high mount setup.

If the pipes i make end up looking really nice, i might make a few sets for people for say $1000. Il post pics when i have finished them in a week or so and il see what you guys think.

Cheers,

Trev

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21041-gt3540/#findComment-446265
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...