Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am having a particullary odd dilemma. For one i have a R33 Series 2 RB25DET, that when i blew 3 ringlands i decided to build it up. It currently has a RB26 crank, with Forged pistons and rods. It also has the RB26 twin turbo setup installed. For engine management i was going to run the Haltech e6k but opted to run the POWER FC. Its from a RB26 though, and since i have 740cc RB25 inj i need to remove the resistor box, i was told by some people to just remove it all togeather, and some said to just terminate all the ends on the harness from the resistor box. I am completely unsure about what i need to do heh. Any suggestions ? Also since i am using the RB26 power fc, i am not sure if all my sensors are the same as the rb25 namely the Oil pressure sensor, the two coolant temp sensors, i know the IAC is diff bewteen the 25 and 26 but do they use same plugs ? also i need a AIT sensor (air intake temp) does this part exist on another car i could source or can i get away with out running it at all. With those sensors are they the same on the SR or the KA or VG or does anyone have a part number for any of those as in the nissan part i appreciate any help !! here is my project linked from another forum i visit if anyone is interested

http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread?id=295315&page=1

please any help even if your sellign those parts let me kno !!!

Well RB25 is high impedance and RB26 is low so youll need to install a resistor box to run the RB25 injectors with the RB26 ECU (I chose to just get 750cc low imp top feeds for my RB25 with 26pfc)

Oil presure and all that is on the lower harness, I wouldnt worry about that, ure putting it into a 240sx by the look of it so all you use it one wire to activate the light in your dash, super simple,

Air temp I used the sensor that PFC D-jetro asks for usage in the SR20 kits, turns out to be a mazda sensor, part number N3A1-18-845, I also ordered the SR20's temp sensor harness so I have the proper plug and all that.

Coolant temp, near all nissan use the same ecu coolant temp sensor, you can keep the one that came on your RB25, but (if you are converting from KA) you can use the KA gauge sensor (the single wire one) for your dash read out so your dash gauge is accurate, well how ever accurate that can be :P

as far as the IAC, thats a tricky one, thats where im at right now, in all honesty it should work plug and play, the actual mechanism is very similar between GTR and GTS-T but I would use a tone tester to verify the pin outs,

R33Paul started on doing a conversion and Mafia finnished it, Unfortunatly Mafia is a pretty busy guy, but if I work it out before he gets a chance to let me know how he worked his IAC I will let you know.

I presume your got a R32/3 GTR pfc? also did you get a D-jetro or the regular one?

its a l jetro that still uses MAFS for a r32/33 gtr, yeah my issue is that i have 740cc inj for a rb25 and i dont wanna have to buy new inj so i was told if i dont use resistor box i would be ok ( i was told the 26 uses low imp and the resistor box makes them low imp, so if i dont run the box i will be high imp) , i am gunna look into that air temp sensor now, so basically, the water temp sensors, oil switch, are from KA, the air temp is mazda, and as far as IAC goes, i know the gtr uses a 4 bolt on compared to the 3 bolt on the rb25, but the rb25 has 2 plugs , how many does the rb26 have ?

  Rezlo said:
What upper harness are you running?

r33 GTR, it sucks cause i dont know where half of the plugs even go so i need to break out toner and mark what each plug is for

When I built my 30 I discovered that the 25 head came with a different coolant temp sensor than the 20/26 (my 20 one was yellow, broke it, put the brown one in from the 25, ran in cold start all the time so nabbed a yellow sensor off a 26 and worked fine), now I don't know if this is a 20/26 & 25 thing, or an R32/R33 thing..

  stricnynel0s said:
r33 GTR, it sucks cause i dont know where half of the plugs even go so i need to break out toner and mark what each plug is for

Welcome to my world, as far as I know I was the first person to do a euro RHD S14 to RB25 conversion, took me quite some time with the help of many people to work out all the wiring to work like it would from the factory.

First thing, have you got the M63/F4 plug all sorted out and the lower harness prepped?

Lower harness prep:

http://www.rezlo.com/Pages/FSM/Files/RB%20...ex%20Cadiao.doc

M63/F4 info should be around, ive got some RB25 -> S info here:

http://www.rezlo.com/Pages/FSM/Fsm.htm

What you can do is take a pic of your harness and email it to me, ill tell you what plug goes where as best I can, the rest you can back probe the ecu plug to work out where that wire lands up.

Cheers

ok i appreciate it, i got some linked some where hmm

not sure on SAU policy on linking on other forums but here is what i got http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread/318574

TTT, anyone got part nums for those sensors , AIT, the 2 water temp ones, and oil pressure, i am going to try the mazda one but a nissan one wont hurt either !!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...