Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It would depend on what the fault is I think...I do know that if you disconnect the knock sensors the ECU detects this and automatically pulls timing out over the whole rpm range..So if knock sensor is open circuit, the same thing would happen...and open circuit sensor would be the most common failure mode..

retarding the timing on stock ecu would require a remap/ecu socket with a new chip written with your tune

are you actually pinging? you can bypass the sensor with a resistor (i think 1 mega ohm is what's used on the z32's) so that the fault code will no longer come up but it's not safe if you are actually pinging. most people who are running safe mods can get away with bypassing the sensor as stock fuel maps are rich.

check out these links for info on bypassing detonation sensor (z32 specific, might apply to r32 also)

http://www.pexcom.com.au/z32cms/e107_plugi...php?content.429

http://www.pexcom.com.au/z32cms/e107_plugi...php?content.305

retarding the timing on stock ecu would require a remap/ecu socket with a new chip written with your tune

are you actually pinging? you can bypass the sensor with a resistor (i think 1 mega ohm is what's used on the z32's) so that the fault code will no longer come up but it's not safe if you are actually pinging. most people who are running safe mods can get away with bypassing the sensor as stock fuel maps are rich.

check out these links for info on bypassing detonation sensor (z32 specific, might apply to r32 also)

http://www.pexcom.com.au/z32cms/e107_plugi...php?content.429

http://www.pexcom.com.au/z32cms/e107_plugi...php?content.305

Nah no pinging... just lack of power in the upper area of rpm. Im thinking it might be a timing issue. And i was thinking if there was something wrong with the knock sensor then it might not be allowing the timing to advance thus causing lack of power and worse fuel economy.

seeing as though it is not pinging it may be worth by passing to see if it runs ok.

and i quote this from the above link:

"A faulty Det Sensor or det sensor circuit causes the ECU to go into safety map (retarded timing and rich mixture= poor performance, bad fuel economy "

That exlains my problem down to a t.

Anyone have a knock sensor for sale?

  • 6 months later...

i have this same issue cuz my knock sensors were not wired in.. its always in safe mode, running full rich with off the wall timing. my Wideband was going FULL rich at high rpms. so im off to wire them in!!

this was good info.

my question!!

how can u wire these knock sensors directly to ecu? can i just wire 1-3 to 23 and 4-6 to 24 direct? is it a 1 signal wire with a ground?? any info would be cool. thanks!

Depends on what the ECU is looking for, most of the Nissan ECU's will register a fault if the knock signal is <1v or >4v that's why I've never understood the resistor mod, as the ECU is looking for voltage NOT a load.

If the knock sensor is over sensitive you can wire a series of diode in-line and it will reduce the volage by about 0.3v per diode (what I had to do to my one to get it to ~2v at idle)

If you're open circuit most likely the sensor is dead and you need a new one

Depends on what the ECU is looking for, most of the Nissan ECU's will register a fault if the knock signal is <1v or >4v that's why I've never understood the resistor mod, as the ECU is looking for voltage NOT a load.

If the knock sensor is over sensitive you can wire a series of diode in-line and it will reduce the volage by about 0.3v per diode (what I had to do to my one to get it to ~2v at idle)

If you're open circuit most likely the sensor is dead and you need a new one

I have researched this and done the mod using a resistor. It works......Basically the ECU provides a constant current across the knock sensor. As the resistance of the knock sensor changes, the voltage drop across it changes....V=I x R gents...If you search my profile I have done a thread on it..

cheers

OK then it's the R34 that uses a different type of detection, the ECU recognizes voltage for the GTt

The knock sensors would be passive sensors on all models, R32s R33s R34 R35 ...The ECU would be measuring voltage drop across the sensor due to the fact that it has a current passing through it...This is most likely how all car manufacturers do it... This is the best way to do it because it is less prone to signal noise and interference from other things happening in the engine bay...ignition system etc

It's definately active on the R34, the workshop manual has the oscilloscope readings you should be getting from the sensor and goes into detail about the voltage range. Also any attempt to put a resistor accross the input throws a fault on consult straight away.

It's definately active on the R34, the workshop manual has the oscilloscope readings you should be getting from the sensor and goes into detail about the voltage range. Also any attempt to put a resistor accross the input throws a fault on consult straight away.

Very interesting...When I did my mod, I had Consult connected and experimented with different resistor networks until the fault code dissappeared...

there would definately be a way of tricking it...how many wires go to the R34 sensor? There must be at least 2 or 3 if it is active as you say...a ground -ve, supply +ve and a signal....

There would be a specific voltage range across the sensor for baseline engine noise under "No-knock" condition. If you know what this voltage is, you could use a zenner diode to clamp the voltage under the Knock voltage...Then as far as the ECU is concerned it would still see normal engine noise signals, but never a knock signal...

Disclaimer: Disabling knock sensors is playing with fire if you dont know what you are doing!!!

Sorry just had to put this out there again as i dont want to be blamed for rooting anyones engine...

Just one wire to the sensor. Between the sensor and ground I get 2.4v DC & 3.4v AC (remember my one is shagged anyway so voltage is off)

2.0v is the recommended reading at idle according to the manual, yeah I've got my one set about there with a diode and now my low/mid-range has reappeared, boost is holding top-end :P

Thats really interesting. Just confirm that the knock sensor is not connect to the ECU when you are measuring this voltage...

2.4V is the RMS voltage of 3.4V AC...In the manual do they refer to frequency at all?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey everyone. Is there a way I can get the original window sticker (maroney label) for my 1995 R33 GTST? I doubt I’ll be able to ever get it but it’s worth a shot to ask
    • Have a vb in honour of the car comming back
    • It was a great, but typical track day, and some VB was ingested at the night time debrief 🤪
    • And so, to round this out, I couldn't be happier to confirm @MBS206 has decided to buy the car. He drove down from sunny QLD with a trailer last week and it is off to its new home today. I'll let Matt confirm on next steps but I understand broadly that the plan is to leave it pretty much as is, and just get some quality wheel time with a nicely balanced car that is pretty much track ready. There are a few a jobs still to be done first but nothing too major and I think its a very smart buy Dinner last night at the Paragon with a round of VBs (mostly) for Neil
    • Well, 50 pages and the end of a chapter for this car. We took it out for a shakedown at Wakie yesterday, and everything went well. There were a couple of niggles: - Oil cooler fitting leak - tightened, cleaned, stopped leaking - Radiator cap overflow fitting was leaking....Mark called it, the overflow fitting was threaded in and not tight....tightened, tested and held pressure - Small oil leak at the rear of the block, probably the turbo oil feed - too hot to get at it comfortably but probably just needs to be nipped up - leak at the driver's side rear brake line where it meets the hardline. Fitting wasn't loose, so Matt backed it off and back on, no further leaks - there's also a leak somewhere on the top of the fuel tank, maybe that cross over fuel line - that was has been left to fix when its on a hoist Otherwise than those niggles the car went great, turned great and stopped great so it was a very successful day out. I'm always really nervous when a car first hits the track after a long break, especially with a brand new engine as well but it was great. VID-20251011-WA0007.mp4  Big thanks to @The Bogan who dropped by and helped out, @MBS206 and my nephew Lachlan the apprentice.  Neil's wife Mel also surprised the hell out of all of us by dropping by; she's up in Tamworth these days but was travelling to Melbourne so had plausible deniability for turning up at the garage, it was great to see her but also obviously a bit sad all round.
×
×
  • Create New...