Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi SAU,

I have dropped an RB25det into my 180sx and it fits but I need to drop it lower to clear the bonnet etc. Im going to slot the engine mount brackets down abit which should give me 10-15mm but im also interested in putting some spacers inbetween the front crossmember and the chassis rail.

What im after is some input as to how this would affect the front suspension of the car. Would it make a difference at all?

Regards

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212255-front-subframe-spacers/
Share on other sites

Hi SAU,

I have dropped an RB25det into my 180sx and it fits but I need to drop it lower to clear the bonnet etc. Im going to slot the engine mount brackets down abit which should give me 10-15mm but im also interested in putting some spacers inbetween the front crossmember and the chassis rail.

What im after is some input as to how this would affect the front suspension of the car. Would it make a difference at all?

Regards

Negative effects on bump steer, Ackerman and dynamic camber change.

Cheers

Gary

Will also lower your roll centre.

Basically, it's like having the front of your car lower (geometry gets worse), but you don't have the gain in lowering the CG (well, not as much as lowering the whole front down).

As for how dramatic the change would be, it depends on how low the car is now, but even then, it's hard to say without modelling in a suspension analysis program. Or, someone with lots of experience (like Gary) can tell you how it would feel having all this stuff changed.

Thought as much.

I guess my next question is: would these effects be very dramatic if I was only to use a small amount (say 3-4mm) of spacing?

Also,

Is there any way to counter these effects?

The front lower control arms should always point slightly downwards (to the ground) towards the wheel. So by whatever amount you lower the inner front lower control arm pivot point you must also lower the outer front lower control arm pivot point. That fixes the dynamic camber change problem.

The Ackerman problem can be fixed by moving the steering rack and/or the steering arms (on the upright). The latter is usually the easiest.

The bump steer is usually corrected with spacers at the outer tie rod ends. Start with the same thickness spacer as you used to lower the outer front lower control arm pivot point.

This is why people change the inlet plenum and/or the bonnet.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
    • Yes then it will turn on but I want the car features to work  
    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
×
×
  • Create New...