Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey poeples, who here has got a piggyback ecu on there n/a, and what sort of power you getting, and how good your fuel economy is, i want to get e manage set up on mine but is it worth it? does it make much difference on an n/a? im after 600km a tank, is it possible?

just a quick note i own the neo6 r34

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212735-ecu-powerfuel-ecomony/
Share on other sites

hey poeples, who here has got a piggyback ecu on there n/a, and what sort of power you getting, and how good your fuel economy is, i want to get e manage set up on mine but is it worth it? does it make much difference on an n/a? im after 600km a tank, is it possible?

just a quick note i own the neo6 r34

its possible...

you really need a decent tuner, lean the car out (into high 13's flat 14) at low throttle, and under heavy throttle/WOT as lean as possible without your egt's getting too high.

alot of tuners are scared and live by the doughy rich 11:1 'safe' tunes, a decent tune with a decent engine should be able to hold 14:1 at WOT on an N/A. (I know of a 500hp n/a that ran this)

so hunt a good tuner, not a 'drift' one, maybe somone a little older, into motorsport, and lean away giving it as much timing as you can, that alone should net you a fair bit better economy. Also pushing it into closed loop as often as possible.

ontop of that, you could run even leaner, and run water injection (water is free) to cool your egt's - im currently playing around with this for my 30de (alot of timing, high compression and lean a/f mixes).

Edited by SKiT_R31

Hey,

I dont have a piggy back, but from a recent trip to thredbo, 5th gear the whole way i used 38litres to 450k's.

City driving i can expect a max of around 500k's to a tank, i would also be interested if a management system would improve fuel.

Thanks for the replies and advice.

i use an safc2.

the regardless of ecu/piggy back, it is only good as it's tuner. there's nothing else really.

i would check the power/dyno thread for more details, because that's what it's there for!!!

using the safc 2, how many kms do you get out of a tank.

450km aggressive tune. check out the power thread for a list of mods.

to be honest, fuel economy is pretty crap. a turbo's efficiency is so much better in terms of driving off boost in the city, and on boost whilst tracking it.

unless you have quite a few mods which is out of the scope of the stock ecu and you wish to clean up the AFRs a bit i personally wouldn't be too phased.

one of the reasons for the SAFC2 was to have the knock sensor when on track.

  • 2 weeks later...

It will depend on how you drive if you drive hard all the time economy will be poor, on the other hand if you drive it easy with the odd blat here or there economy will be better. Avoid short trips only drive medium to long.

I have a stock R34 N/A with the Neo 6 motor, 5 speed manual & I can get about 550K's before the low feul light comes on, I drive it easy & only drive medium to long trips.

I am thinking of fitting cruse control to help with economy [have had cruse on my other cars & got good economy out of them].

When I get it serviced I will talk with my mechanic about leaning it off  abit.

Hope this may help

Cheers :wub:

damn thats some good milage, ok when you say take it easy when driving, isnt it bad for the skylines to shift to early and drive it at low rpm? at which rpm do you change gears? i average mine at 3000 rpm all the time, and yeah my fuel ecomony is non existent, i think i might need on of those safc's and get some tuning of some sort going

damn thats some good milage, ok when you say take it easy when driving, isnt it bad for the skylines to shift to early and drive it at low rpm? at which rpm do you change gears? i average mine at 3000 rpm all the time, and yeah my fuel ecomony is non existent, i think i might need on of those safc's and get some tuning of some sort going

It really goes more by throttle and load than revs, for example - if your shifting at 3000rpm, and using half throttle to accelerate on gear change (to pull it from ~ 2000rpm to 3000rpm again) its actually more efficient to rev it to 4000rpm using less throttle.

i.e. its more efficient to rev the car at 4000rpm on 1/4 throttle than at 3000rpm half throttle, as the motors in its power/torque. The idea is to use less acceleration, if you go revving it to 4k on half throttle, it'll use more petrol. When I'm tight for cash or babying the car to make it to the servo, i just drive as if 10% throttle is WOT, so if your in low revs and the car isn't accelerating, shift back.

its all about airflow, more air = more petrol, so the more air your letting in, the more fuel can be added, but at the same time, the higher its revving, the more air thats is sucked from the same throttle opening. There are other variables, like high load = richer fuel mix, too high revving will make too much friction etc.

I usually drive with a fairly active throttle, fairly heavy on take off, but as the engine revs & power increase, i keep lowering the throttle, so the engine essentially holds the same power. But at the same time, i have my fun and give it the stick fairly regularly. On my last 2 cars (both N/A RB30's, one auto one manual) i happily got 550km till fuel light (about 50-55L) this includes a fair bit of hwy cruising though (to and from work).

I don't know how your getting such bad economy, check your 02 sensor, clean or replace your coolant temp sensor, don't thrash it when its cold (richer fuel mixture), if all else fails, get a safc tuned lean on the dyno at low throttle, should be safe.

is that 450km of highway driving or just normal suburban driving? if it's just 450km of suburban stop/start driving then it's not too bad... I've fixed alot of stuff on my car and I just did a cruise yesterday and got 600km from my tank (10L/100km) and could get about 700km if I do only highway driving. Don't get an SAFC until you're 100% sure that any problems are fixed... tuning over the top of problems isn't a good idea and you'll get better results if you're 100% sure your car is upto spec. Usually the problems that cause poor fuel economy are just sensor related, it's just a case of tracking down the sensor that is playing up and fixing it.

damn thats some good milage, ok when you say take it easy when driving, isnt it bad for the skylines to shift to early and drive it at low rpm? at which rpm do you change gears? i average mine at 3000 rpm all the time, and yeah my fuel ecomony is non existent, i think i might need on of those safc's and get some tuning of some sort going

thanks for the replys, my car also has slight backfires when at low throttle when its slowing down, it sounds hot for a n/a ;):D but yeah its never good for the ecomony, that why i reckon it need a good tune, im gonna assume its burning more fuel then it needs to if it has slight backfires, which gurgles as i slow down, what you guys n gals reckon about this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • ok so if i wanted to go 18's i would go for 8's  in front 30+ or 32+ off set at front and the back 9 would be ok? what offset should i aim for.. then can i do some  hunting for wheel rim choices..    If i get this - will this fit all around: Size: 18 x 8.5 +37 - n what tyres size tyre should i get for front n back?  
    • Absolute f*cking nightmare. I had to take breaks constantly, and I was always pissed off when I got home. The line split in Italy on day 2 (we drove from the Netherlands), lol. Driving any narrow European town was... well, sh*t.   Appreciate it man. Here, I'll just drop a favourite from the load I took on Saturday.   I'll update here when things happen with the car, the thing is, with stock power and almost everything chassis-wise taken care of, there really are no problems. 268,000kms now and counting.  
    • Ah! I actually managed to snag a lightly used set.... that aren't so suitable for me right now. They don't work on a GTT without some cutting or creative heat moulding. I thought about reselling them myself cause I didn't want to murder them, but it looks like I'm probably going to attempt to murder them/melt them because I may as well. @GTSBoy @PranK can somebody close this thread?
    • Hey mate,  I have a set, one is slightly damaged but wont be noticable once installed.  Shoot me a message if your still after them 
    • I couldn't wait But, the black constant tension hose clamps were too thick and there wasn't enough clearance at the T/B and I couldn't get it to seat properly, so I had use a silver one there I also added some 3" silicone over the alloy bit that goes through to hole on the radiator support as it looked like it was sitting on the edge of the hole in the radiator support, I never noticed a rattle or anything, but there was a witness mark It is basicly done, and I can live with the silver hose clamp at the T/B, I will get a black clamp for the head vent though where it is attached to the bulkhead fitting  It never stops...LOL, only issue now with the shock tower brace is it slightly touches the under bonnet liner now, if I leave it it will either wear some paint off the brace where it touches, or damage the liner, so I removed the liner to see what I have to work with, with the liner removed I have about 20mm of clearance, but sadly the middle part of the underside of the bonnet is only dusted with paint and looks crap, so I cannot have that, but.... as I have a roll of Carbuilders premium under bonnet insulation in the garage laying around that is only 5.5mm thick (we were going to use it on the boys Patrol, but he crashed the front of it a few months and it was written off, hence why he now drives my old Honda Accord Euro), I'll use the OEM liner as a template and get the Carbuilders stuff fitted up to cover that dusted paint up
×
×
  • Create New...