Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just dynoed my r32 gtst 5 speed and i was just wondering what power other ppl have and with what mods u have aswell...i drove my car onto the dyno did 3 runs and droive it off diddnt even check timing ... i just wanted to check air:fuel ratio for track day on sunday....

i have 243.6 hp at the wheels on 13 PSI

trust 3 inch cat back exhaust with totally std dump/front pipe and cat

hybrid 600x300x76mm cooler

mines ecu

gtr fuel pump

std turbo

hks power flo filter

thats all that i know of/can remember at the moment....

:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21294-r32-rb20det-5-speed-rwhp-outputs/
Share on other sites

Generally the Standard Turbo's won't make any more than 160-170rwkw no matter what other mods you do.

This is 214rwhp-228rwhp.

UNLESS you have a nice little RB25DET turbo hanging off the side then that power is around the mark.

Different dyno's also vary. I've had my car on 2 different dyno's both were Dynamic Dyno's. It made within 5rwkw of each other.

But they were both using the same software version etc.

One was used for dyno tuning almost 100% V8's the other was 100% turbo's etc.

You are making around 181rwkw.

I made 164rwkw on 15psi or 220rwhp.

Its basically the limit of the turbo's as they arn't able to flow much more air to make more power. You can up the boost a little more I guess but then the ceramic exhaust will will probably disagree. :P

Loading her up on the dyno it made full boost (15psi) by around 2500rpm. Or on the street 15psi is 3400rpm in third gear.

the air/fuel was a little rich up top but thats all good...... time for more boost :)....

as far as i know i do still have std turbo but i was told through another person that it had a rb25 turbo installed at one time but i diddnt think it did... maybe i was wrong..... i have dyno sheet that says 243 rwhp so im happy eitherway lol......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...