Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just put on a high flow (had to replace my standard turbo as it shagged its self) and was looking at the injector duty cycle on my avcr, it seems that at low throttle that the % is around 90 but when i boot it seems to go down to about 30, is this right, does the % show how much of the injector duty cycle is not being used?

i also noticed that the peak hold shows the higher %.

also what is the (if lowest % is worse) lowest i should take the standard injectors, fuel pump, afm and ecu to?

i have a pfc and z32 afm, need to get fuel pump and injectors then tune it but untill then i want to get the most i can out of it safely, atm im running about .6 bar (9 psi) would like to up to .8 (12 psi) but also want to keep it safe.

any help would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/215562-avcr-injector-duty-cycle/
Share on other sites

Well 80% is considered a best practice ceiling... doesn't stop countless ppl hovering around 90% - 95%

If you right, and the #'s are inverted... I guess 10-20% would be what you'd wanna keep it under (over?) lol

Rem, thats at max load (airflow) the motors ever likely to see. Ppl keep that safety margin in case of a cold night, or a serious over boost.

Edited by GeeTR
if u have power fc why not just use the map tracer or use the display to show injector duty

so i take it u dont have rpm in your avcr?

^^ phhft, i fully missed that.. oh dear

i guess i should have mentioned that i have them but im waiting to get the rest and fit them all at once then tune it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...