Jump to content
SAU Community

take it on an XR6 Trubo?


Recommended Posts

Guest Nobel Soul

Organising street drags, or implying that you are is not what this forum is for.

Remeber that next time.

It's a public forum and yes police do read it, and we as a whole do no want this sort of talk. If you want to race go to the motorplex.

Skyzer

Kool i am with you, but as you saw dude, i had only put one comment on this whole thing, so dont bank it all on me, the behaviour of imature kids with power machines aint my problem. However you banking this whole crap on me doesnt show a good fair judgement on your behalf as a moderator or whatever you are. I made no reference to street racing or anything of the type. I just mentioned my friend having and XR6 Turbo, and wanting to test it. Thats all, the rest had nothing to do with me, oh and i do believe you can see the different IPs and all, i would like an apology man.

Like i said earlier i am skyliner myself.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21846-take-it-on-an-xr6-trubo/
Share on other sites

Guest Nobel Soul

Good son of rajab, gee how bad, Adrian_Perth you sure have no good will or manners mate, where did you grow up? at a pig farm, how can you cowardly talk behind peoples back. I had nothing to do with all this, other then a simple query. It isnt my fault if y'all cant behave. But here are some facts, so all sit back, take a chill pill and read...

Skyline R32 GTS-T RB20DET 1998cc DOHC 24 valve EFI Straight 6 Turbo 160kw @ 6400rpm 263nm @ 3200rpm 7500rpm 1260 kg 6.49 seconds 14.63 seconds

Skyline R32 GT-R RB26DETT 2568cc DOHC 24 valve EFI Straight 6 Twin Turbo 208kw @ 6400rpm 353nm @ 4400rpm 7500rpm 1470 kg 4.79 seconds 12.80 seconds

Skyline R33 GT-ST-25T RB25DET 2498cc DOHC 24 valve EFI Straight 6 Turbo 187kw @ 6400rpm 295nm @ 4800rpm 7000rpm 1390 kg 6.18 seconds 14.39 seconds

Skyline R33 GT-R RB26DETT 2569cc DOHC 24 valve EFI Straight 6 Twin Turbo 208kw @ 6800rpm 367nm @ 4400rpm 8000rpm 1530 kg 5.30 seconds 13.30 seconds

Skyline R34 25GT-Turbo RB25DET 2498cc NEO DOHC 24 valve EFI Straight 6 Turbo 206kw @ 6400rpm 343nm @ 3200rpm 7000rpm 1410 kg 6.00 seconds 14.20 seconds

Skyline R34 GT-R RB26DETT 2568cc DOHC 24 valve EFI Straight 6 Twin Turbo 208kw @ 6800rpm 392nm @ 4400rpm 8000rpm 1540 kg 4.90 seconds 12.90 seconds

those are the facts for your stock standard Skylines, i am sure my mate knows them, so how about you guys give him a fair go, cool down do your research and dont phucken get big headed talking nos and all, and then comes to day, all you have on your cam is his rear wheels. Some of you need to spend more time off this site then on it.

Whaat , again ??

This thread obviously got deleted cos of the aggression shown by some newbies.

Don't get banned as well.

What has the times got to do with and who has a stock one anyway.

What your mate Kane suggested was illegal and he claims his car is not stock. The suggestion to take it to the plex was met with derision.

Ahh stuff it , Ban em all...

Cheers

ken

Guest Nobel Soul

This isnt my life line, so if you guys want to ban me, so be it mate, like i said earlier some of you need to spend less time on this forum. I also am not a peace broker so what beef you got with my mate take it to him.

I will catch you all later, when you calm down a bit and think with your heads and not asses.

cheers

Nobelity aint no probability!

i should of been clearer in the pm Nobel sorry.

I've probably made it look like its all your doing which after having another read it wasn't sorry for that.

the reason my comments are in your first post are; thats the method we use delete the thread apart from the first post then post the reasoning in that first post.

closing the thread now.

Guest Nobel Soul
Originally posted by skyzerr33

i should of been clearer in the pm Nobel sorry.

I've probably made it look like its all your doing which after having another read it wasn't sorry for that.

the reason my comments are in your first post are; thats the method we use delete the thread apart from the first post then post the reasoning in that first post.

closing the thread now.

no hard feelings mate.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...