Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What was the MPH for RH9?

The first run I saw was [email protected] off the line then planted it but not a clean run. I agree - radials on first meet, would have been better.

they ran a 10.6 @ 146 to finish up. shows the car will do a 9 with a better driver and set up.

i just would have liked to have seen it run on radials. I even offered them the use of our tyres and rims.

Mark's car is definitely a machine! Would have been great to see it run a 7...

Was a good day, just a pity that it dragged out for so long before the eliminations started, and then ultimately, it got cancelled.

Oh dam was waiting for RH9 to come out :)

Wonder why Croydon hasnt prettied up Devilish...

Mark's car was awesome, did the best burnouts..I didn't see twoggle? :)

from the other thread...

News on our car...

Got diff in and running friday....put Autronic in and had a few problems getting it running. Finally got it sorted late Saturday afternoon and tuned. The ATTESSA ecu was not recieving the correct signals from the Autronic to run the 4WD. We tried bridging over a TPS signal and lost the bloody tune!! The Autronic went bonkers and took an hour to recover it. Mark retuned the car in about an hour and by midnight had it running and making good power. We again got out the wiring diagrams and found that the earlier bridge we ran was on the wrong pin...bugger. Got the TPS signal to the ATTESSA and the 4WD came alive. However the output was making the TPS ecu input unstable and we decided at 2.30am to pack it up and concentrate our efforts on Marks car. Deciding that running the car while not 100% was not worth risking the chance of damaging it...so yes with only a few hours sleep that night we rocked up and set a new Aussie GTR record.

they ran a 10.6 @ 146 to finish up. shows the car will do a 9 with a better driver and set up.

i just would have liked to have seen it run on radials. I even offered them the use of our tyres and rims.

Hey i thought it was only @137mph

But not 100%.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They're all horrible. X-Trails have had a nasty sounding 4cyl since forever, no matter what engine family it came from. The CVTs only made that worse. Then the whole Renault thing only made every Nissan that was contaminated by them even worse again. The only fun I've had in a X-Trail was having it blown sideways across a frozen Minnesota highway at 90 mph trying to make it to the airport to get out of the frozen hellhole of Hoth. Nearly died. Was great fun.
    • Alrighty, I'll have to grab a couple pics and type out something soon in another post. I haven't driven a modern X no, this would be the first one really. Yeah the rental boxes are always cheap as chips right? So I'd doubt that anyone was handing out GTs to go and abuse. But I s'pose I could be wrong for sure. New cars these days though? Pretty unimpressed with what I see now; 20 years and all that, like you said. It just kind of worked out to have these two cars now. I'm pretty pleased with that, don't need much else. I'm sure you lads are right about the temps and for sure, you wouldn't have much time to drive 'em down there if you all were like me. I do hate sweating all over the seats though😆
    • Let large companies that are making money off selling kits do the preliminary engineering for you. If they all do -10, then that is all you'll ever need. 
    • Hopefully it ends up being something manageable, like a hone, rather than a full bore—it would be a huge relief if it’s not as bad as it looks. Hang in there; these setbacks are annoying, but it sounds like you’re handling it as smartly as possible.
    • At the end of the day, it’s all about understanding the odds and being comfortable with the potential cost, whether it’s horsepower on a build or chips on a roulette table. And I have to say, the Laine example made me laugh—some people really do embrace that carefree, “roll and see” attitude!
×
×
  • Create New...