Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

gcg said they could do a t3/4 that was not ball bearing for 1800 i think, but if you just go a stock turbo you know what youve got and even if its not right you havent spent 2g

Meggala I just got a hks t04e to put on my 32, only cost 400 and I am modding the stock manifold to take the extermal gate, do you have any info on the turbo, hp rating boost efficiency range etc, thanks.

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hey clint its a treeible turbo you don't want it .

you will have to send it straght to me

:lol:

as for info it depends on the the a/r ratios etc.

btw I wouuld love to see pic of the manifold when done

400 hp would be a good guide talk to adam32 as he has one on his r32

meggala

its got a .6 ar exhaust and comp housing, not too big, about 59mm exhaust wheel i think.

the manifold is not as easy as i thought as there is not much room, i was going to do it like the jms onveia but there is less room in a 32 so the plate has to be angled to clear the strut tower. will take pics once its done wont be for a couple of months, as im dooing the inlet manifold as well and need to buy rx7 injectors and the wastegate.

Joel,

You know Tim at RPM pretty well so why not consider the GT28 400HP unit for RRP $2300. It has a small exhaust A/R of 0.63 so spool up should be good. 4" inlet and 0.7 A/R compressor should also give you 200rwkW easy.

All you need is the spacer for both rocker cover clearence and also adaption to the T3 flange.

Basically Tim can only do the T28 or the GT2510 which will only make around 180rwkw.

SO... I poped around a few places today found a HKS EVC which is a dual solanoid and has the rpm thingo and also a map sensor.

Then I came across a jap importers that is getting in a GT2540 next week that is from a GTR, he is splitting them as a friend of his wants one for his SR20.

I might put up with a bit of lag, it really depends if my injectors do end up being bigger than std. If so here I come 2540.

clint32,

fyi, the HKS T04E is actually rated at 500hp and would be perfect for an Rb20DET engine. a little laggier than the standard turbo but power/boost would come on quite hard.

check out the following link, it should give u all an indication of the hp ratings fro all the turbo's mentioned.

http://www.hksusa.com/categories/?id=1093

btw, a friend has a 400hp GT25 on his R32 RB20DET, along witha FMIC, unichip, and bigger pump and it's producing 222kw at the wheels on 18psi, with heaps more potential.

i guess it all depends on what u want from your car joel.

//RS500.

Joel, what turbo did you end up getting, or are you still deciding?

Have you spoke to Ben at Tilbrooks (Brains) He has a R31 wagon with a HKS 2530 on a Rb20, been in Zoom etc. That car goes pretty hard. It makes around 220 at the wheels, but being auto with 2500rpm stall, I don't think lag is to much of a problem in that car.

I think that fact remains that any bigger than stock turbo will be a bit laggier, but the trade of is consitant boost right up to the redline

I am in the process of getting **** toghether with my car for a bit of a power-up, including turbo, bigger intercooler and maybe new injectors or pressure regulator on the existing ones.

Let me know how you go

Chris

So, just how laggy are these turbos (hks 25 series) ? as i just recieved my gt2535 today and would have thought being a BB turbo and still being reasonably sized it should be quick to spool up. I thought i should have full boost by about 3500 rpm.

My turbo has a .60 a/r compressor and a .64 exhaust housing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
    • Ceste, jak se mas Marek...sorry I only have english keyboard. Are you a fan of Poland's greatest band ever?   
×
×
  • Create New...