Jump to content
SAU Community

GTR BNR34 C-west body kit on a R34 GTT


Recommended Posts

Guest I.B.6.U.B.9

Just wondering if you guys have ran across any GTT's having the full C-West body kit for the GTR (check this link N-1 Distribution because I was thinking of importing the GTT myself and probably asking for an aftermarket version of the GTR C-West body kit to be fitted on the GTT as I have spoken to the above dealer and was told that an original C-West GTR body kit will not fill on the GTT because the GTR is wider. What do you guys think?

What do you think I should do in regards to getting a GTT over here with the C-West bodykit for the GTR.

Hope you guys can assist me.

Many thanks..

P.S I live in Melbourne, has anyone imported any cars through any dealers from Melbourne and have found them quite good? I was thinking of going with CARIZMA

Are you thinking of spending 10 squillion dollars for the C-West kit, then "butchering" it to fit on the GT-t? If I were you, I`d hang back and look for a similar (and cheaper!) kit that FITS the GT-t... no worries then.

Just as a side note...

The guy who owns THISs15-1.gifchop-top S15 drifter LITERALLY lives around the corner from me in Settsu Motoyama...:D no lie.

I got an original Cwest GTT bodykit on my car after considering the GTR version. Ill tell you now that what I have now is worth more than 7000 after painting and fitting. If you can afford the GTR version after you have bought new guards and so forth you will be out of pocket for a large sum of money. Just get the 34GTR if you can afford it.

The Cwest GTT kit is quite nice anyhows though now i wish id gone for the East Bear kit.

*EeEek! the r34 gtr one looks the sh*t...(as in nice)

and as for the GTT, hmm.. its more of a subtle look.

i'd try and go for the GTR kit on a GTT for sure,

maybe a bodykit place can copy the kit somehow?? maybe Jetspeed or something can try and clone the thing??

im sure theyve done it b4.. :)

Originally posted by CONAN

Rezz: what do you do for a living?

are you japanese??

or an exchange student of some sort?? :):D

im just curious...

No, no, no. I'm not Japanese, but my wife is. Thats why I've been here for over 3 years now.

I'm an English Teacher (well, more like a personal entertainer of 20-25 year old Jap girls:D ). But I'm also **free plug here** starting up my Japanese Performance Parts business "K's Online Garage". Specializing in all brands OTHER THAN Trust, Blitz, HKS, Apex and so on...

>I.B.6.U.B.9: That means I'll be doing East Bear.

But I'm not taking orders yet, should be up by the end of the month.

/Rezz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...