Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

At the moment, Sunday is mostly free at go karts, theres a bday group booked in at 2pm till 3pm I think but they said they could fit us in between races, ie, there 8-10 race then our 8 to 10.

As it's a bit late and we only have around 7-8 wont be booking in, everyone will need to pay individually. People tell me if they cant make it.

posted 2 to 3pm earlier as a good time, other bday group is booked in for that, which we could split the time with since they have only 8 as well, still an individual booking thing though. need to bring s helmet or use theirs.

Hey Cejay,

With all the ifs and buts, whats the final outcome?

I think from reading your posts - We pay as per normal 3x10min sessions (not booking an hour) but have an allocated time to drive? If I've got this right that sounds like the best way as people won't be paying for those not turning up.

posted 2 to 3pm earlier as a good time, other bday group is booked in for that, which we could split the time with since they have only 8 as well, still an individual booking thing though. need to bring s helmet or use theirs.
Hey Cejay,

With all the ifs and buts, whats the final outcome?

I think from reading your posts - We pay as per normal 3x10min sessions (not booking an hour) but have an allocated time to drive? If I've got this right that sounds like the best way as people won't be paying for those not turning up.

Yes you'd pay as normal for yourself only on the day.

The way the guy explained it is they'd like to know what time we'd show up, makes it easy on them. Essentially an unofficial booking. We can rock up whenever, but of course doing that won't guarantee us getting a run. It does seem to make the most sense, as you are just paying for yourself. The other way only really worked if we had 10 people which we don't.

Alright, booked in for 5 people so far, turn up at 1:45 to being race at 2pm, theres another group on during that time as well.

It's important you show up early to fill out the paperwork etc.

We'd alternate with them, 1 race on then them. So at this stage it will be 2 10 minute races for all up 32$. If we want more can decide on the day. At this stage after 3pm is clear. If more people want in please advise as I will have to call them to up the booking. Ie atm if family of 4 want in they would probably be chucked into our group at that time, at the same time we can't over book.

Just to confirm you guys will need to fill out the disclaimers and pay seperately, and will need an adr approved helment if you don't want to use theirs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...