Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got the turbos out of the road car and one of them, I can't tell which is blowing smoke through the exhaust.

I'm on a tight ass budget here, and while I can get the standard R32 turbos rebuilt, I'm not a big fan of the ceramic wheels so I'm a little reluctant to spend money on them.

My goals are not power orientated. This is my road car, daily driver, to and from car. I've got race cars which I play with, so I'm after economical in both purchase and running. Immediately after finishing this post I'm moving on to putting the new KME lpg system in to the car so that should give you an idea where I'm coming from.

I've checked on getting steel wheels on the T28s and that's going to run about $1k each, which is not in the budget. I can get N1 wheels for about $1250, but again, that's not in the budget.

My thoughts are using a set of turbos off a pair of SR20s in the RB26. I believe they are steel wheel, and/or there are cheap Chinese turbos out there for about $300 each. I'm not afraid of using the Chinese turbos, the quality has increased greatly on these things and I do all the work myself, so if the thing shits itself, It's just a little more time for me in the shed.

So big question is, has it been done, and what are the possible problems. As it is, I believe the exhaust inlet flange is the same, but I can't tell on the exhaust outlet. I believe that air inlet is the same, but I'm not sure if the angle is right, and I know that air outlet flange is different, but that won't be too hard to change.

Must be a few people out there that have done the reverse from GTR to RB20, any help would be appreciated.

not exactly the answer ur looking for but from what i have seen you can get a pair of gtr turbos second hand for about $400...

why not sell the sr20 turbo's and buy some gtr turbo's?

Theres nothing wrong with the ceramic wheels if its just a road car.

Buy a second hand set for sub 600 bucks and be done with it.

There is a pair of R34 turbos in the for sale section for stuff all.

SR20's have a different exhaust housing and the compressor housings are also different. I dont know if the comp housing is interchangable with the GTR but the exhaust is not due to the wheel diameters.

Haven't got anything yet, so I'm just looking at ideas for the moment.

Are you sure the casting on the rear of the turbo is different? From pictures the rear housing seems to be the one thing that is common among the 2, in both inlet and outlet.

The front housing is totally different, it seems the mounting holes for the inlet are out by 90 degrees. Led me to wonder if a GT28 hat off an old GTR turbo could be easily machined to fit. They should by rights be similar.

Still might go the old ceramic route, but my main concern is that the occasional higher than normal squirt of boost could make the thing come apart. I usually run around 14-15 psi, which is more than recommended for the ceramic wheel turbos. A newer set of turbos could make this a less likely problem.

Thanks for the advice.

SR20 wont fit and housing wont change over as wheels are differrent.

Wheels are different for sure, but they can be machined to match provided the hats are of the same diameter and the profile of the t28 is not larger (can take material away, but adding is harder :blush: ).

All pie in the sky at the moment, but I'm curious

Turbos native to or intended for twin RB26 std manifold apps have the unique or what Garrett call "compact" T25/28 or GT25/28 turbine housings . The dump flange pattern is different to generic GT25/GT28/SR20 .

The compressor housings are designed to suit the RB26's air in/out and they have the two mounting eyes for RB26 turbos fluid plumbing fittings .

With the amount of work involved in removing and replacing RB26 turbos I'd be wanting to be real sure that they were designed to work properly on that type of engine .

Cheers A .

Yep, starting to sound too hard. Not one to shy away from a challenge, but in the midst of an engine rebuild, 2 race car builds, and an LPG installation on the go, it might be worth putting it on the back burner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...