Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

First off just a hello from merry old England, great site by the way :bunny:

I'm building a RB30 using a RB25 VVT head off a R33 GTS-T and aiming for around the 700bhp mark. The car will be pretty much a full time track car.

I just need a few pointers on what spec accessories to go with the engine.

So far I have forged conrods, forged mahle pistons with a 8.5:1 compression ratio, these will get ceramic coated too. Headgasket will probably be a Cometic 1.2mm or similar.

My main question is about the valve train set-up. I am thinking solid lifters, am I right in thinking that the RB26 has solid lifters as standard and will go into the RB25 head?

Also cams, what spec camshafts would you go for with the aim of 700bhp? There seems to be quite a choice from 256, 260 and 270 degree shafts.

Valves, are the standard valves happy to handle the power, or are they worth replacing too?

Turbo wise I'm either going T04Z or Holset HX40, haven't decided yet. Both will supply me the power I require though :banana:

The last question is what gearboxes do you run when tou reach this level of tune? I have a couple of RB25 boxes here already, and I have heard mixed reviews on how much power they can take :bunny: some peeps kill them at 500bhp and others will cope in excess of 1000bhp :bunny:

Sorry for the long post and all the questions, but it would seem that you guys are the best to answer them :D

Cheers

Dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/227768-rb30-helpideas-needed/
Share on other sites

1. The RB26 solid lifters dont work on the RB25 VVT head - without major modification. Tomei make solid lifters for the RB25 VVT head.

2. I am making 700 bhp plus with 272 cams with smallish lift of 9.35mm, with std valves

3. The gearboxes are incredible strong and will handle the power you are looking for plus a couple hundred hp more - any box will eventually self destruct if severly abused with with massive rpm launchs etc.

1. The RB26 solid lifters dont work on the RB25 VVT head - without major modification. Tomei make solid lifters for the RB25 VVT head.

2. I am making 700 bhp plus with 272 cams with smallish lift of 9.35mm, with std valves

3. The gearboxes are incredible strong and will handle the power you are looking for plus a couple hundred hp more - any box will eventually self destruct if severly abused with with massive rpm launchs etc.

Hi Spoolup

Seeing as you are hitting the bhp area where I want to be, anychance you could post up the spec of your engine? and what turbo your running :D

Cheers

Dan :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...