Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently had a 3" dump fitted and the original heat shield over the turbo and dump was removed.

Should I get some exhaust wrap on the dump?

How effective is exhaust wrap in reducing under bonnet temps?

www.flyn.com.au is selling 6m of fibreglass exhaust wrap for $48. Anybody using this stuff? Is this stuff any good?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22793-should-i-be-using-exhaust-wrap/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Im looking into doing the same thing this coming week fo rmy new dump pipe. An estimate from an exhasut shop was that i would need approx 10m to do a 3" dump pipe. This would allow the dump/front pipe to be covered past the bottom of the firewall.

Add to this the expense of the clips to secure in place, and the coating to protect from the elements and i have decided to get the dump pipe ceramic coated. At approx $80 it is neater and perhaps better value, i cant say which works better as i have never used the exhaust wrap.

I have had my exhaust manifold and exhasut housing done by Competition Coatings and i have been happy with their work.

10mtrs was for dump and front pipe, as the front pipe normaly had a heat shield that goes all the way down to the cat.

My thinking is they are shielded for a reason so want to do the same to be sure that nothing on the firewall/floorpan is damaged by the hot exhaust. (My old R31 used to cook the floorpan as i had the exhuast tucked up nicely to ensure good ground clearance.

With the exhaust housing of the turbine after a 30min drive you can hold your hand about 1" from the housing for about 15sec before things start to get hot, so would seem to be working. I wish i could have tested it with a thermocouple before/after but didnt want to have to take the turbo off after having instaled it as the coating takes about 4-5 days.

I'd definately recommend wrapping the dump. I'm having mine ceramic coated, then wrapped. The ceramic coating alone is enough to allow you to touch the dump/or exhaust manifold without burning yourself.

The secondary advantage to keeping the heat trapped in the exhaust gasses is that they help spool the turbo quicker:D

I imagine that it not only allows the turbo to spool quicker but it MAY also reduce back pressure as the gas has a faster velocity hence it gets out of there quicker allowing the motor to breathe a little better in the higher rev's?!?! Maybe... :)

Depends what material you use. I have heard of a number of stainless manifold cracking, but usually due to the poor choice in stainless type (there are many type with different compositions). My manifold is made from steam pipe, it has a much greater thermal mass, and therefore isn't prone to cracking like the thin-walled stainless.

I had a 3" dump of mild steel and the engine bay got bloody hot, so hot that I got paranoid so I wrapped it, which made a huge difference to underbonnet temps.

Have now fitted a stainless ceramic coated dump, and I dont think it is quite as cool as the heat wrapped mild steel, so I will be heat wrapping it aswell.

Having higher velocity in the exhaust, apart from spooling up the turbo quicker, can aid in cylinder scavenging. Also increased velocity decreases pressure, and back pressure is not your friend either:)

Bottom line, if it makes the car go faster/harder, its all good. People have been coating and wrapping manifolds/dumps/turbines for a long time for good reason.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...