Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cars are a hobby not an investment.. well some cars that have letter like GTHO or HQ might well be good investments.. but our car's aren't.

I doubt you were looking to get the money you spent on it back.

You will lose money on it no doubt.

but you will make more money in total by taking the car back to stokish and selling the parts off.

I'd say looking at those pics there is probably a few thousands worth of stereo which you would make in selling it all compeltely seperate (not as a package)

the motor (stick the stocker turbo's back on) would sell for $3K ish or so (is it R32 or R33 rb26?)

the turbo kit you could almost make back what you paid for it.

those wheels would sell quickly at boostcruising or fastfours or hot4s no doubt.

etc etc..

4 door series 1 skyrine with manual and RB25 back in there in that colour might sell for about $10K

then with the sale of your ECU and all other bits, you'd have closer to $20K then you're ever going to see from this car sold as is.

thanks for the replies. truth be told my reasoning for wanting to sell is to buy something a lot more simple and spend the coin making it go, but since everyone feels im better off parting it out i might aswell sell off the stereo keep the car and work the engine.

I wouldnt mind entering it in one show before i rid myself of it or strip it back, not to win but just so ive done it. might look at auto salon, brisbane.

Edited by ow_damnit

Yeah look, Ill be honest, I dont like the car much - not at all to have a dig at you, simply personal opinion.

With chrome rims and a very loud colour like that one, you limit the market of who might be interested in the car quite a lot.

You might well get extremely lucky and find someone with just the same taste as you who will love the car as it is - but unfortunately, chances are most prospective buyers either wont want a car that looks just like yours, or will want to do it themselves.

Best bet is definitely to part it out and sell it closer to stock. Will make most likely a little more money, and it will actually sell quicker that way Id say.

Good luck mate!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...