Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just want to ask a few questions..

1. What horsepower will a r32 driveline handle? I have a brass button clutch, so the clutch has been looked after already.. Im thinking around 400hp at wheels is what my car will have when im finished...

2. With this amount of hp, what sort of management system should i run? I was thinking standard comp.. aftermarket comp.. what would be the best for the job?

3. Where is the hicas fuse? If there is a fuse? Or, how do i kill the hicas, with out the lock kit? eg, for quick squirts on the track.

Thanks guys.. hope the questions dont seem silly.. and that i have this post in the right thread!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22994-a-few-r32-questions/
Share on other sites

1. What horsepower will a r32 driveline handle?

Pretty hard questions to be answering as there are so many variables. Those mainly being how well driven/mantained has the driveline been, and also how hard/easy your driving style is on it.

300rwkws is a lot of power and i dont see a high km RB20 gearbox living at that power especially if you are going to do track work. So if, some will say when it breaks, you may need an RB25 or other box.

2. If you are looking at 300rwkw id personally be looking for n aftermarket computer, most likely Autronic or similar. They have features that will help engines live at this hp as well as being able to give accurate enough control over fuel & ignitoin in the 1st place.

Features like boost control, limp home function, cuts for when boost and water temps etc go past set point etc etc. All nice features that help an engine live.

3. On a 32 the HICAS is hydraulic (33s electronic) and i wouldnt recommend disconnecting the Hicas computer/pulling fuseses etc. This would result in a rear steering rack that has some free play in it when cornering which cant be a safe thing or a nice thing when punting the car quickly.

There are numerous local kits and Jap kits that range from an ECU by-pass and steering rack shims (Tomei) to a solid chrome moly bar which replaces the factory rear rack.

As for only disconnecting the HICAS for track work, i have had mine disconnected for some time and cant honeslty say i dont notice any difference on the street, but sure as hell notice extra stability on corner exists at the track. So i woudlnt worry about having to reconnect it for the street.

Does this help or confuse you? Sorry:D

with the 32s you can remap the std ECU, which on a budget would be your best option. having said that not many people successfully make 300rwkw on a budget so it may be best to look at an autronic

the HICAS system control can be found underneath the parcel shelf, just disconnect the SMALLER plug. i d/ced mine cos it would continually bring the light on and kill the power steering. i havent noticed any play through corners and for a RWD car pulls through the corners fairly quickly

I wouldn't buy an Autronic personally, me and a mate did some serious homework for his rb20 S13 and without a doubt MOTEC is the best in fact it is probably the best management in the world.

I suppose my comment isn't really fair about the Autronic...I just think that if you are going to push for 400rwhp then it will not be the best choice. My suggestion is to contact Cramer Dyno & Performance in Toowoomba (It is well worth the drive) and chat to Tim he is great with MOTEC, MICROTECH, UNICHIP and most other management options so have a talk to him (get him to do the work too if possible) email me for more info etc [email protected]

Sorry RB20 gettin rid of the sil soon chasing a gts-t type m and want to pull about 225rwkw maybe more depending on funds.

Hmm maybe scouring the wreckers isnt a bad move then as long as you know how to set it up, did u have ne probs get all the wiring etc??

I know where there is a couple of guys in wa that do remapping mite see about prices.

Install is easy....unplug stock ecu, plug in jap ecu, start car and go hard :D Not sure if they are all like this but I never had a problem....also got rid of speed cut and lifted rev limit by 500rpm there was no actual tuning involved and when I coupled it with a big pump and apexi s-afc I took power up to just under 220rwkw (remember that 220kw is the absolute max for stock injectors)

RB20 owners should all but forget about Power Fcs, they are a real find if you come across one, an even better find if they work properly (mine didnt)

Motec & Autronic are fairly equitable ECUs if they have the same software upgrades, only thing is Autronic works out a bit cheaper. My thoughts are your comparing a Bentley to a Rolls Royce, both are good choices with auto tune functions etc etc.

Other ECUs have their + & - but if the budget stretches to a Motec/Autronic then you cant go wrong with either.

As for the HICAS, i have replaced the rear steering rack with a chrome moly rack to which the tie rods screw into. The lines/pump/old rack were then removed/bypassed saving a few kgs, and still leaving the steering check light on the dash functioning. (A good thing)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...