Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok guys i have a small problem might be something might be nothing.

here goes, i have found a part missing in my engine bay and im not sure what it is?

Attached is a picture of my engine bay (purple) missing the part and another engine bay (white) with the part.

Hope someone can shed some light on my little dillema

thannks a heap :ermm:

post-53515-1217924978_thumb.jpg

post-53515-1217924997_thumb.jpg

Edited by MP_R33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231046-part-engine-bay/
Share on other sites

here is a picture of my bay with the missing piece:

91777a8dd4.jpg

here is a picture i found on the forums with the part:

5fef5e1e56.jpg

fixed

I dunno what it is, I'll have a look when I get home, but it just looks like a bracket for holding something, and nothing in your car seems to be falling off, so not a big worry :ermm:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231046-part-engine-bay/#findComment-4058522
Share on other sites

I originally thought it had to do with the standard snorkel, but it obviously doesn't...

it's just a bracket, and I can't imagine it is too important. Your car seems a LOT more standard then the other, so it could be for or from any thing at any time while the owner was modifieng things...

I'll still have a gander at mine when I get home for you though :ermm:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231046-part-engine-bay/#findComment-4058545
Share on other sites

The only thing I can think of at the moment is that it's there to hold the oil breather in place. You can see half of it just behind the pod box, it looks like a little pod filter. The two oil lines are heading to it...

Certainly not standard :ermm:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231046-part-engine-bay/#findComment-4058553
Share on other sites

not really... some people just don't like them...

They are usually removed durring modification... but yours looks pretty stock...

well yer the car is untouched modification wise!

i just noticed the bolt holes being empty and tried having a look at what it was

Do u know exactly how the part operates or what it does or any information on the part?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231046-part-engine-bay/#findComment-4058643
Share on other sites

depending on who complied your car it may be in a different location. - havea look around for something with 3 hose lines on the top of it.

2 lines from the plenum/TB - 3rd line goes to the fuel tank.

for ingestion of fuel fumes at idle. similar to whats refered to as "pollution gear" on old carbi engines.

wont affect anything, but EPA stipluates it is required.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231046-part-engine-bay/#findComment-4058721
Share on other sites

sounds like the same thing, just hidden -

yer well i dont know much about the part apart from when i was getting the car road worthy in order to do so it stated "secure the pollution canister" which was located virtually infront of the drivers side wheel guard!

unless anyone can think of a part which sits in the same position i mentioned, im gathering that thats it??

thanks alot guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231046-part-engine-bay/#findComment-4058790
Share on other sites

ah...i dont have one of those but also never noticed it was missing!

I have a big similar container located umm above the heat shield for the turbo, i always assumed it was an oil catch can :s now im wondering if its this? kinda embarrasing lol

yep some places use a real large unit and place it there as ther is no room at the front for that size unit.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231046-part-engine-bay/#findComment-4059392
Share on other sites

I know i'm a bit late to the game, but I was going to say "it's where your factory charcoal cannister should be!".

I noticed a few years ago when I was shopping around for my Skyline that most of the cannisters had been replaced and relocated as part of compliancing. I think some compliancing places don't have the same-sized replacements, so they have to mount their bigger units somewhere else just to fit them in.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231046-part-engine-bay/#findComment-4059531
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...