Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

im buying this power fc.

it is a rb26 pfc that been changed to suit rb20 with a patch loom.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...Fc-t223618.html

if it is reset back to the base map, will it be able to run on stock rb20 injectors & afm?

im thinking that resetting it back to base map it would expect there to be gtr injectors installed.

Apparently it did run with the rb20 afm, but im not sure on the injectors.

i have a wideband so i might be able to adjust it to get it running, but seems to me i would need to adjust the fuel map for smaller injectors than the more usual upgraded ones?

i will be upgrading injectors & afm later but i want to get this fc running asap.

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/232223-rb26-pfc-on-a-stock-rb20/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hey mate,

i have told u that it will run...

why bother messing around with the base map??

get it tuned as u will need to do anyways and the tuner will adjust the injectors/afm to watever u have in ur car...

i was getting re tunes for the cost of hours spent so its not gonna be expensive! and then u will have the power fc running to ur setup NOT someone elses!!

thanks!

do note that if you perform a DATA INIT on this PFC it will return to a normal rb26 PFC

that is, you will loose the settings that make it work as an Rb20 PFC

so the injectors, afm, afm ramp, and maps will go out the window and the base map will be an Rb26 map.

it wont idle with rb26 base map settings and will run like a bucket of junk - so if you do DATA INIT the unit, make sure you note these settings down

hey mate,

i have told u that it will run...

why bother messing around with the base map??

get it tuned as u will need to do anyways and the tuner will adjust the injectors/afm to watever u have in ur car...

i was getting re tunes for the cost of hours spent so its not gonna be expensive! and then u will have the power fc running to ur setup NOT someone elses!!

thanks!

i made this thread before i got that info off you via the fone.

cheers

dude it works, i have sat in the car, driven the car, watched the diagnostics on the pfc, it works, 100%.

i believe it that it works, i just want to know if i can get it working in my car asap with stock injectors & afm

cheers

do note that if you perform a DATA INIT on this PFC it will return to a normal rb26 PFC

that is, you will loose the settings that make it work as an Rb20 PFC

so the injectors, afm, afm ramp, and maps will go out the window and the base map will be an Rb26 map.

it wont idle with rb26 base map settings and will run like a bucket of junk - so if you do DATA INIT the unit, make sure you note these settings down

thanks yeah this is what im interested in, all i want to be able to do is set it for a base rb20 map.

(im running stock injectors/afm for now)

so its just a matter of inputting the injector & afm specs after data init & it will be driveable?

cheers

Edited by norwest_rumbler
or just plug it in when u get to the tuner and tune it!!!!!!!

i want to plug it in and have it running asap on a 'base tune'

im not going to drive it hard at all (& run very low boost) also i have a wideband gauge to keep an eye on afr's

once thats ok i will fit my turbo.

then i will buy some injectors & a afm. i might fit them myself especially since i should be able to adjust the fc maps/settings.

then after that i will take it for a tune.

so thats why i would like to get the pfc running on stock injectors/afm.

cheers

ok i just got a pm from someone who has some great advice-

"My suggestion is DO NOT re init the PFC.

Leave it alone and tweak the IGN and INJ maps via the commander and you air/fuel gear to make the car drivable in the short term.

When you get to a tuner with Datalogit, he can save all the existing info, then re-init the pfc, dump the relevant info back in the pfc, do the idle learn and finally start tuning."

so if i do this i should be ok.

thanks for the help people!

Edited by norwest_rumbler

to all those interested

re DATA-INIT'ing the PFC is fine and perfectly acceptable

-BUT

you must re-enter the specific settings to make it work for the Rb20 hardware.

these settings are specific AFM correction, and injector correction and latency

if you enter both of those it should function and run like a normal Rb20 PFC.

there are no phyiscal modifications done to the PFC

the changes would be done on an in-line loom adapter (typically)

the main wire changes are 02 sensor, afm sensor, injector wire flip

its easier to do it on a loom adapter such as a boomslang.us adapter

that way the PFC is a true RB26 PFC and the loom and settings make it an Rb20 PFC

re DATA-INIT'ing the PFC is fine and perfectly acceptable

-BUT

you must re-enter the specific settings to make it work for the Rb20 hardware.

these settings are specific AFM correction, and injector correction and latency

if you enter both of those it should function and run like a normal Rb20 PFC.

but ive been told that those settings cant be inputted by the hand controller & must be done by a tuner with datalogit?

i think thats what he meant anyway when he said this-

" If you do a DATA INIT, you re set the ecu to the original RB26 maps.

Unless you have access to Datalogit, you don't know what's going on with your existing AFM ramps and the other variables in the unit.

Every item has a ramp rate and they're not accessible via the hand commander. "

my first preference would be to a 'data init' & change the afm correction & injector correction/latency so as Paul says it would become a rb20 fc.

that seems easier??

yeah if they goto the level of editing the whole AFM ramp (20 values) then you need datalogit to reapply those

i was certain cubes had it working without editing the whole AFM ramp - i could be wrong

to all those interested

re DATA-INIT'ing the PFC is fine and perfectly acceptable

-BUT

you must re-enter the specific settings to make it work for the Rb20 hardware.

these settings are specific AFM correction, and injector correction and latency

if you enter both of those it should function and run like a normal Rb20 PFC.

there are no phyiscal modifications done to the PFC

the changes would be done on an in-line loom adapter (typically)

the main wire changes are 02 sensor, afm sensor, injector wire flip

its easier to do it on a loom adapter such as a boomslang.us adapter

that way the PFC is a true RB26 PFC and the loom and settings make it an Rb20 PFC

yes thats wats been done!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...