Jump to content
SAU Community

Kahli's Annoucement

Lil Miss 32

By Lil Miss 32,
in South Australia

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

typevu Grand Master

typevu

Posted
Posted
its a downgrade in model, theres no denying that. So for you 33 haters, SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

+1 for 33 haters... some people prefer the OLDER shape... so what! Is it newer? no. did it come out after the R33 shape? no. is it an upgrade? no. there ARE those of us that prefer the R33 shape out there peoples!

..............Am I in a Skyline enthusiast forum or an "I hate R33's" forum? :(

Jack88 Experienced

Jack88

Posted
Posted

i dont understand your reasoning kahli,you said it just gets damaged too much at school by jelous people,yet you have bought another skyline....and running costs,lol minimal difference if any between them.

is it just me or does this not make sence to anyone else ether? good on you for buying another one tho but i just dont understand the reasoning behind it.

CRoNic... Grand Master

CRoNic...

Posted
Posted
+1 for 33 haters... some people prefer the OLDER shape... so what! Is it newer? no. did it come out after the R33 shape? no. is it an upgrade? no. there ARE those of us that prefer the R33 shape out there peoples!

..............Am I in a Skyline enthusiast forum or an "I hate R33's" forum? :(

I'd just say, an opinionated skyline enthusiast forum!

I like all Skylines (even the R30!) but I preffer the 32/34 shape... and so did Nissan! :P jk jk

Tangles Grand Master

Tangles

Posted
Posted

Stagea's are heaps cheap now, like 10k for a series 1 rb25det auto awd.

awesome upgrade from a 33-32-s15.

I'll too have a pod to go to a new home next week, a K&N pod filter for a RB25det either stock or z32 afm

typevu Grand Master

typevu

Posted
Posted
I'd just say, an opinionated skyline enthusiast forum!

I like all Skylines (even the R30!) but I preffer the 32/34 shape... and so did Nissan! :P jk jk

lol yes very openly opinionated

I definitely wouldnt mind removing my K&N pod too - less psh psh but the intercooler pipe is in the way of the snorkel for the stock air box dang it :(

rhys5169 Mentor

rhys5169

Posted
Posted
its a downgrade in model, theres no denying that. So for you 33 haters, SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

no, a downgrade would be going the turbo model down to a NA model.

this is a change in year of car so the term "downgrade" is invalid, especially when your moving to a lighter better performing car :(

Krishy Grand Master

Krishy

Posted
Posted
+1 for 33 haters... some people prefer the OLDER shape... so what! Is it newer? no. did it come out after the R33 shape? no. is it an upgrade? no. there ARE those of us that prefer the R33 shape out there peoples!

..............Am I in a Skyline enthusiast forum or an "I hate R33's" forum? :(

You tell em Vu.

Damn 33 haters.

Damo_R34 Grand Master

Damo_R34

Posted
Posted
no, a downgrade would be going the turbo model down to a NA model.

this is a change in year of car so the term "downgrade" is invalid, especially when your moving to a lighter better performing car :(

Incorrect, if i went from a 32 to a 33, you'd say "nice upgrade". She has downgraded in years, theres no argument about it.

rhys5169 Mentor

rhys5169

Posted
Posted
Incorrect, if i went from a 32 to a 33, you'd say "nice upgrade". She has downgraded in years, theres no argument about it.

lol i would say "ahhhh why would you do such a thing!??"

downgraded in years yes, but you didnt say that at the start :(

steveP Proficient

steveP

Posted
Posted (edited)

lol u guys are trippers.

gernerally 33's are better.. and not because of age, they got better brakes, suspension, larger engine (i wouldnt say better than RB20, but if u like less revs and more torque), upgraded interior, generally newer and longer lasting parts. only thing the 33 has going against it is the looks, looks very out dated.

anywho after all of that, i would still go a 32 :blink:

oh.. and just coz a car is newer doesnt make it better. thought some of u guys were smarter than that lol. i mean why get a 32 gtr.. get a vx commo, its newer and must be better right :P

Edited by steveP
fullyhyperlite Proficient

fullyhyperlite

Posted
Posted

LOL at steve :blink:

And +1 Jack...it doesn't make sense. If it was me i guess i'd just keep it till i could get the S15 right? And anyways. People at school are just jealous and they always will be whether its a 33, 32 or an S15. Just cos all they can afford is a commonwhore :P

nos man Mentor

nos man

Posted
Posted

i have a hks mushroom pod and with a few more psi than standard i feel it's pulling more air in than the apexi i had on! getting a flutter can also be done with an aftermarket bov, just tighten the spring a bit and you get the flutter at the same time a bit of air escaping! but even now i'm running the standard plumb back on my intercooler pipe because quite frankly it's been better than any bov's i've put on!

how come so much hatred for 33's? yes it's a whale but it still managed to lap the nurbuurgring 20 seconds faster than a r32! :blink:

RubyRS4 Grand Master

RubyRS4

Posted
Posted
ohh god

this arguement is going nowhere

it comes to personal preference

going from 32 to a 33 is an upgrade

going from 33 to a 32 is a downgrade

simple as that

Here we go!

argument.gif

:blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By Kapr · Posted

      Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • GTSBoy
      R32 GT-R: 4WD Light Turns On After Bumps – Code 19 (ETS Motor) But No Issues Found

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Bireley_32
      R32 GT-R: 4WD Light Turns On After Bumps – Code 19 (ETS Motor) But No Issues Found

      By Bireley_32 · Posted

      Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...