Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

put it this way - I drive a third generation rx7 - considered by many to be the best all-round handling rwd jap car of all time.

best handling car I've ever owned/driven? 1990 roadster/mx5

I had a basic jap model and here's a few things it had over the base oz model - bilstein shocks, std lsd, 10 extra kW

deifinitely worth getting an import (if the insurance doesn't set it off too much).

my mx5 cost me A$3.5k (in japan)

these cars are looooooooooooots of fun - just don't expect miracles in a straight line

put it this way - I drive a third generation rx7 - considered by many to be the best all-round handling rwd jap car of all time.  

mr2.... ? :(

I've been looking at a few of the mx5 on the lists.. they look very dated nowdays though (the inside mainly).. even f.ugly in a way

There are a few crazy 'off-the-shelf' conversion packages for them.. would be interesting to pursue considering you could bring in the car for so little.. not sure whether they suit 89 mx5 though??

Non turbo MX5's are pretty gutless. I have a friend with a turbo fitted to his and it's still not blindingly fast, though for what it is, it's not too bad. Other shortcomings are it has no back seat and a small boot, which doesn't make it very practical if it's your only car.

If you don't need a back seat or a boot, then try to find a turbo version. I think going to an NA MX5 from a mildly modded Skyline would be pretty annoying in the power stakes, regardless of how much better the handling was.

I have a blown 99 model MX5 and it's awesome fun, even though my S15 is quicker. They really go around corners like it's on rails, you can push it and push it and it never bites back. The NA MX5's are bloody woeful in terms of power delivery, but put a turbo or s/c into the package and it's a completely different car. When looking for a 1st generation MX5 (89-97), make sure to find one with a 1.8L engine in it. At least they have a bit more power than the earlier 1.6L ones.

ok no one answered my questions properly...

is it even RWD???

What speed does it come as? 5sp 6sp?

Turbo from STOCK??? or after market? visa versa on Super charger...

what 1.8L makes at the wheel?

so I gather MX5 1st gen are made between 89~97...

so 2nd Gen is 97~now?

if so how much difference is there? as modification and performace...

after maket parts? are they as expensive as skylines?

Insurance? how are they? especially turbo ones...

cheers

JOe

Yes they are RWD, up to 2000 5 speed only then 6 speed(we did get a 10th anniversary edition in 99 and i think it was an option from 98 os)

The early models were 1.6l but ours were non-power steer so they actually feel quicker than the 1.8l as they had pwr str.

They are all factory NA but there was a limited run of about 50 that Mazda Australia turbocharged, but the new model due out late this early next will have a turbo option.

There doesn't seem to be much difference from what i've seen (i work at a Mazda Delearship) between ours and the imports but Mazda Australia doesn't support imports so you can be stuffed if you need something thats different.

Carlos

Originally posted by GTS20X

There doesn't seem to be much difference from what i've seen (i work at a Mazda Delearship) between ours and the imports but  Mazda Australia doesn't support imports so you can be stuffed if you need something thats different.

This is kinda strange as Nissan Australia do supply parts for the RB25DET which was NEVER sold here.

IMO with the help of the MX5 clubs, parts and support would be absolutely no problem.

Buying a 1989 MX5 would be a much safer bet than say a 1989 R32 GTR.

T.

The big problem with the parts is that we only have the listings for Australian models (which sometimes have UK listings as well) and needing a VIN no which we can't decode the Jap VIN no's.

The early Australian deliveried MX-5's are getting quite cheap now (around $10,000) and since the price drop on the current model they're all dropped in price used.

boss from my last job had a 90 mx5 (aus delivered). She uses it for track racing and loves it.

In its current form its 325rwhp! I think she put in a 2.0 l jap engine in it. Also has supercharger and motec engine management. I went for a few rides in it and it was crazy!

i think an 89 import would definately be a worthwhile as a project car.

ps - if u see a mx5 around melb with plates OUR005 and dodgy 2 tone silver and red... dont race it.. it will hand you your ass on a plate :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
    • Legend. I ended up finding the facebook account of the owner of the first car i sent but sadly he deactivated the account. I think you’re right in saying it’s some sort of well done custom job. Really appreciate your help anyways.
    • Totally equivalent. Stock often goes from the comp cover because that's where the actuator is also installed and the factory needs 2" of hose to make the connection - and it comes as a pre-assembled unit. They totally have a boost reference from somewhere between the turbo and the throttle(s). Oh, jeez. Just do it in M12 then. We don't actually care that much. I would expect any such AN converter fitting to rely on an o-ring or some other seal onto a flat surface under the flange of the hex**, because bolt threads are no intended to provide a pressure seal. unlike..... pipe threads. **which also requires a suitably flat and smooth surface on the turbo's boss to provide the seal.
    • I also used NP   That’s were it’s seems to be the best place to fit it? All schematic shows also that it’s should be referenced from the turbo housing. But idk, I do see high hp cars without any connection or anything to their turbos, so I really don’t know how they connect their things
    • I do have loctite 243 and 246 and a few more models. I could drill it now in place and make new threads for m12 and order an4 - m12 coupling and fit that to the turbo. Run a braided hose to the EBC which I could get a an4 to 1/8npt 
×
×
  • Create New...