Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was recommended the Spiral muffler from ET also. I did a little research and they are not recommended for turbo application.

The JunBL Spiral muffler is designed for N/A application.

But in saying that 3.5" with 400hp at the fly I can't see it being a problem. :ermm:

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I was recommended the Spiral muffler from ET also. I did a little research and they are not recommended for turbo application.

The JunBL Spiral muffler is designed for N/A application.

But in saying that 3.5" with 400hp at the fly I can't see it being a problem. :ermm:

what do jun make for turbo application? Theyre very quiet at idle but anything over 2500 rpm is a very throaty sound

-D

I was recommended the Spiral muffler from ET also. I did a little research and they are not recommended for turbo application.

The JunBL Spiral muffler is designed for N/A application.

But in saying that 3.5" with 400hp at the fly I can't see it being a problem. :)

probably designed for a little back pressure

+1 for ET.

rad guy, great work, and good price. twin 2.5" straight pipes from the cats (basically straight off the extractors), junBL x-pipe, lukey resi's, sounds awesome.

buy mine,

full jap spec system, with twin drift pipes

3 inch the whole way, hi-flow cat like you've never seen before (no its not gutted)

and ask a few ppl on here that know my car it looks tough and sounds tougher.

I was recommended the Spiral muffler from ET also. I did a little research and they are not recommended for turbo application.

The JunBL Spiral muffler is designed for N/A application.

But in saying that 3.5" with 400hp at the fly I can't see it being a problem. :)

that's crap he and mark formulated that muffler for all types of cars and i know this because i know Mr LIm aka JunBL owner inventer ect and Marky

i dont know why Kellie said metal cat, cos im pretty sure she doesn't even hav a cat on her car :bunny:

thats right i dont have a cat i said all that stuff about the exhaust because thats what Marky would recomend

:D

heaps funny for someone to get defected :)

that's crap he and mark formulated that muffler for all types of cars and i know this because i know Mr LIm aka JunBL owner inventer ect and Marky

oeeerrr. :P

Crap.. the spiral is there to kill noise with 'minimal' impact on exhaust flow given the size of the Milotin.

If you wish to make some reasonable 250rwkw+ power out of the car and worried about noise then its worth while considering 2x larger body 3-3.5" straight through mufflers.

Straight through is by far the best especially if you have plans for the car. Those louvres occupy area within the pipe reducing the available area for air to be pushed through.

If a 3" straight through muffler begins to struggle over 270rwkw reducing the available surface area will introduce backpressure. Sure it will sound quieter but it will kill power.

The spiral muffler is a shit load better than the multipass 'turbo' muffler but none the less if its all out performance you want straight through is the best.

Especially if your pushing your size pipe near its flow limits.

JunBL no where claim the spiral offers better 'power' performance than a straight through muffler. It simply states they are one of the best on the market that 'increase' (overstock) power while retaining streetable noise.

Canons are shit at noise control. So IMO its run a Milotin with reduced performance but a quieter exhaust or run a large body straight through muffler with reasonable sound control and improved performance.

All depends on the plans for the car. Their 3.5" spiral should be fine but from speaking to a few workshops the 3" kills power a tad.

Get Mark to throw up some dyno sheets of his new released 3.5" spiral. Would like to see something making up around 300rwkw+ with one. 3.5" tyypically = 300+rwkw territory.

A nice comparison - No mufflers, straight through canon, spiral canon.

The spiral muffler is a shit load better than the multipass 'turbo' muffler but none the less if its all out performance you want straight through is the best.

Especially if your pushing your size pipe near its flow limits.

Hence why I went for a Kakimoto dual setup (approx 103db unfortunately).

When I want quiet, I shove a couple of cone silencers into the two tips and reduces by approx 10db.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...